Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/473/2020 of YARAKALA RAMA KRISHNA Vs MUTYALA RAJU on 8 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 473 OF 2020 Between: 1. YARAKALA RAMA KRISHNA, YARAKALA RAMA KRISHNA FATHER NAME
APHC010141732020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 473 OF 2020
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. YARAKALA RAMA KRISHNA, YARAKALA RAMA KRISHNA FATHER NAME MUSALAYYA AGE 60, ADDRESS R/O. BANGARUGUDEM, TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
2. BURLA VENKATESWARA RAO, FATHER NAME. GANGA RAO AGE. 47,
HINDU, AGED
YEARS, R/O. BANGARUGUDEM, TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. MUTYALA RAJU, S/O. NOT KNOWN, HINDU, MALE, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ELURU.
2. P RACHANA, W/O. NOT KNOWN, HINDU, FEMALE, AGED 40 ABOUT, THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ELURU REVENUE DIVISION, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
3. BSVSRL RAJU, S/O. NOT KNOWN, THE TAHSILDAR, TADEPALLIGUDEM MANDAL, TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to to punish the respondents/Contemnors for their willful disobedience of order Dt. 17.03.2020 in I.A.NO. 1 of 2020 in W.P.No. 6723 of 2020 on the file of this Honble Court and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioner herein on 28-09-2020 in CC 473/2020 Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP) The Court made the following order:
The instant contempt case is filed complaining willful disobedience of the interim orders passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2020 in W.P.No.6723 of 2020.
2. It is stated that the said writ petition has been subsequently disposed of vide order dated 26.09.2023, observing that the grievance of the petitioner has been resolved.
3. Having regard to the same, interim order passed in the writ petition merged with the final order passed in the writ petition.
4. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
Dated: 09.04.2026 BSK
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 473 OF 2020
Dated: 09.04.2026 BSK