Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/17716/2019 of Dharla Suvarthamma Vs THE STATE OF AP on 7 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 17716/2019 Between: 1. DHARLA SUVARTHAMMA, W/O RANGAIAH, AGE 65 YEARS, LABOUR, R/O
APHC010369962019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 17716/2019
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. DHARLA SUVARTHAMMA, W/O RANGAIAH, AGE 65 YEARS, LABOUR, R/O MARRIGUNTA VILLAGE, KONDAPURAM MANDAL, S.P.S NELLORE DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPT., SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SPS NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE.
3. THE TAHSILDHAR, KONDAPURAM MANDAL, SPS NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE.
4. DHARLA THIRUPALU, S/O NARASADASARI, 50 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O MARRIGUNTA VILLAGE, KONDAPURAM MANDAL, S.P.S NELLORE DISTRICT.
5. DHARLA SREERAMULU, S/O NARASADASARI, 55 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, R/O MARRIGUNTA VILLAGE, KONDAPURAM MANDAL, S.P.S NELLORE DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in mutating the names of respondents' 4, 5 86 6 in respect of my property in Sy. No. 219/23 of Marrigunta Village, instead of my name without any notice and not following the procedure as illegal arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and also violation of Article 14, 21 and 300 A of the Constitution of India and Consequently direct the respondents including my name web- land records in petitioner's name and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd 8s 3rd respondents to act upon petitioner's representation dated 23 .09.2019,16.09.2019 immediately and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PAVULURI SREENIVASULU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following ORDER:
Sri.V.V.Raghavaiah, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stands vacated. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 08.04.2026 rsd
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 17716/2019
Date: 08.04.2026 rsd