Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/25543/2025 of GOTHINA DINESH Vs THE STATE OF AP on 7 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 25543/2025 Between: 1. GOTHINA DINESH, S/O.LATE GOTHINA RAMESH, AGED ABOUT

APHC010486122025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA

PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

WRIT PETITION NO: 25543/2025

Between:

1. GOTHINA DINESH, S/O.LATE GOTHINA RAMESH, AGED

ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/O. 16-2/2, PANDRANGAPURAM, ARILOVA, VISAKAPATANAM CITY VISAKAPATANAM

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE

STATE

OF

AP,

REP.

BY

ITS

PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY,

HIGHER

EDUCATION

DEPARTMENT,

SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

2. THE

ANDHRA

UNIVERISTY,

REP

BY

ITS

VICE

CHANCELLOR, ADMINISTATIVE BUILDINGS, ANDHRA

UNIVERSITY, VISAKAPATANAM.

3. THE

REGISTRAR,

ANDHRA

UNIVERSITY,

VISAKAPATANAM.

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. ANAND KUMAR KOCHIRI

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR SERVICES II

2. GANGA KUMAR CHAKRAVARTULA

The Court made the following:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH

WRIT PETITION No.25543 of 2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

The present writ petition is filed declaring the action of the respondents, particularly respondent No.3, in not considering the representation made by the petitioner on 12.07.2025 and not releasing the family pension and other benefits of the deceased mother of the petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader appearing for respondent No.1 and learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3.

3. The fact remains that the employee has already died. In the said circumstances, the petitioner, being the legal heir, made a request/representation to the respondents. The respondent authorities have to take a decision as per rules and communicate the same to the petitioner.

4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondents, more particularly respondent No.3, to consider the representation made by the petitioner on 12.07.2025 and to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of two

(2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH

Date: 08.04.2026 Ivd

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH

WRIT PETITION No.25543 of 2025

Dated: 08.04.2026

Ivd

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead