Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/14/2026 of M SRINIVASULU Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 7 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 14/2026 Between: 1. M SRINIVASULU, S/O. RAMANAJANEYULU, AGE 45 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO. 19 VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA

APHC010716452025

IN TH

WEDNE

TWO

THE HONOURA

W

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. M SRINIVASULU, S BUSINESS, R/O. D VILLAGE AND MAN

2. M. PRAMEELA DE MANAGING DIREC BHANUMUKKALA V NANDYAL DISTRIC

1. THE STATE OF AN CIVIL SUPPLIES ANDHRA PRADESH

2. THE DISTRICT RAYACHOTY, AND

3. THE STATION H TOWN, ANNAMAY Petition under Articl circumstances stated in pleased to issue a writ or Writ of Mandamus, decla 29,975 Kgs (600 bags) o E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) ESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL WRIT PETITION NO: 14/2026 S/O. RAMANAJANEYULU, AGE 45 D.NO. 19-399, TELUGUPETA, BA NDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHR EVI, D/O. GUDURU BALA VENKAT CTOR OF M/S. SRINIVASA RICE MIL VILLAGE, OWK ROAD, BANGANAPA CT. ...P AND NDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL DEPARTMENT, SECRETARATE, H. COLLECTER, ANNAMAYYA D DHRA PRADESH. HOUSE OFFICER, RAJAMPET PS YYA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RES le 226 of the Constitution of India pra the affidavit filed therewith, the High rder or direction more particularly one aring the continued possession and of rice and by not taking third party DESH

LAPATI YEARS, OCC. ANAGANIPALLI RA PRADESH. TA SUBBAIAH, L, SY.NO.244, ALLI MANDAL, PETITIONER(S) L SECRETARY, VELAGAPUDI, ISTRICT, AT S, RAJAMPET SPONDENT(S): aying that in the h Court may be e in the nature of d non-release of security for the value of seized property by Respondent No.2, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 300A of the Constitution of India, and against the principals of natural justice and consequently to direct the respondents to release 29,975 Kgs (600 bags) of rice, and hand over to the petitioners and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to release 29,975 Kgs (600 bags) of rice of the petitioners by accepting third party surety/ guarantee for the value of the seized stock, and hand over to the Petitioners, forthwith pending disposal of writ petition before this Hon'ble court and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to amend the prayer in the present writ petition as follows As the present writ Petition is filed, pleased to amend the main prayer as to the declare the orders of the 2nd Respondent vide Ref.No.CS(2)/96/2024 Dated 18-12-2024 and subsequently order of the HON'BLE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE, KADAPA in CrI.M.P.No.185/2025 in CrI.A.No. 10/2025 dated 28.10.2025 as illegal arbitrary and violation of the articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the constitution of Bharat and consequently set aside the orders of the 2nd Respondent vide Ref. No.CS(2)/96/2024 Dated: 18.12.2024 and subsequently orders of the HON'BLE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE, KADAPA in CrI.M.P.No.185/2025 in CrI.A.No.10/2025 dated 28.10.2025 further direct the 2nd Respondent to release the Stock 29,975 Kgs (600 bags) of rice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. VELADI SAI SRI HARSHA Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR HOME

2. GP FOR REVENUE

3. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES

The Court made the following order: Sri V.Sai Sri Harsha, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with a liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition. Permission, as sought for, is accorded.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh Writ Petition. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 08.04.2026 MP

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

WRIT PETITION No.14 OF 2026 Dated : 08.04.2026

MP

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead