Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/23425/2023 of CHALLA SESHAIAH Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 7 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 23425/2023 Between: 1. CHALLA SESHAIAH, S/O.KOTAIAH, AGE. 65YRS, OCC. CULTIVATION,
APHC010451692023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 23425/2023
Between:
1. CHALLA
SESHAIAH,
S/O.KOTAIAH,
AGE.
65YRS,
OCC.
CULTIVATION,
OGURU
VILLAGE,
KANDUKUR
MANDAL,
PRAKASAM DISTRICT-523105.
2. DIVI SRINU,, S/0. VENKATA SUBBAIAH, AGE.54YRS, OCC.
CULTIVATION, OGURU VILLAGE, KANDUKUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT-523105.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, TO GOVERNMENT, IRRIGATION AND COMMAND
AREA DEVELOPMENT, (WATER RESOURCES)DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR
DISTRICT.
2. THE
SUPERINTENDENT
ENGINEER,
IRRIGATION
AND
COMMAND
AREA
DEVELOPMENT,
(WATER
RESOURCES)DEPARTMENT,
PRAKASAM
DISTRICT
AT
ONGOLE.
3. THE DIVSIONAL EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION AND
COMMAND
AREA
DEVELOPMENT,
(WATER
RESOURCES)DEPARTMENT,
KANDUKUR,
PRAKASAM
DISTRICT.
4. THE ASSISTANCE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION AND
COMMAND
AREA
DEVELOPMENT,
(WATER
RESOURCCS)DCPARTMCNT,
KANDUKUR,
PRAKASAM
DISTRICT.
5. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, , PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT
ONGOLE.
6. THE SUBCOLLECTOR, KANDUKUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
7. THE
TAHSILDAR,
KANDUKUR
MANDAL,
KANDUKUR,
PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
8. THE
MANDAL
DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, ,
KANDUKUR,
PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
9. THE PANCHAYATH SECRETRAY, GRAMA PANCHAYATH, OGURU VILLAGE, KANDUKURU MANDAL, S.P.S.R.NELLORE
DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of Respondents more particular 4th Respondent granting permission by Letter Dt.14-08- 2023 permitting the People of Oguru Village of Kandukuru Mandal, Prakasam District to lay 1.00 diameter N.P.3 Class Pipes for raising a Culvert on Channel of Oguru Tank narrowing the width of channel cause obstacles to the people of Adhi Andhra Colony and more particular prevent free flow of water in tank is arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and against the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh water, Land and Trees Act-2002 and WaltaRules-2004 and consequently Suspend the Operation of Permission Letter Dt.14-08-2023 in respect of Sy.No.240 of Oguru village Kandukur Mandal Prakasam District and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to consequently Suspend the Operation of Permission Letter
Dt.14-08- 2023 in respect of Sy.No.240 of Oguru village Kandukur Mandal Prakasam District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. VEERAPU CHITRA DIVYA SREE
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR IRRI AND CAD (AP)
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
On 23.01.2026, 20.02.2026 & 23.03.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner and the matter has been listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Date: 08th April, 2026
RKS