Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/757/2023 of KARRI SATYANARAYANA Vs TEKUMUDI BOJJAMMA on 7 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 757/2023 Between: 1. KARRI SATYANARAYANA, S/O MOOLAIAH, HINDU, AGED 80
APHC010116992023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3332]
WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 757/2023
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. KARRI SATYANARAYANA, S/O MOOLAIAH, HINDU, AGED 80 YEARS, RESIDENT OF VENKATAPURAM, KAKINADA RURAL MANDAL, E.G. DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. TEKUMUDI BOJJAMMA, W/O RAMA KRISHNA, HINDU, AGED 65 YEARS, RESIDENT OF SUBBARAYUDUPETA, MALLAM, PITHAPURAM MANDAL, E.G. DISTRICT
2. TEKUMUDI VENKATA RAMANA, , S/O RAMA KRISHNA, HINDU, AGED 45 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D.NO.2-41, SANTHA MARKET, SAMALKOTA, E.G. DISTRICT.
3. TEKUMUDI GOVINDU, , S/O RAMA KRISHNA, HINDU, AGED 43 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D.NO.3-16A-85, BARMA COLONY, BEHIND RTC COMPLEX, KAKINADA E.G. DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toMemorandum of Grounds of Civil Revision Petition aggrieved by the impugned order in I.A. No 504 of 2022 in O.S. No. 226 of 2018, 21.11.2022 on the file of the Court of the I Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada IA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in I.A. No 504 of 2022 in O.S. No. 226 of 2018, 21.11.2022 on the file of the Court of the I Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada, inthe interest of justice, pending disposal of the above Civil Revision Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SAMBOJU BALA GOPAL Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. The Court made the following order:
This Civil Revision Petition is filed questioning the legality and correctness of the order 21.11.2022 passed in I.A.No.504 of 2022 in O.S.No.226 of 2018 by the learned I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada.
2. No representation for the petitioner.
3. The case status information placed on record by the Registry shows that the suit in O.S.No.541 of 2012 was decreed with costs on 24.11.2025. In view of the same, this Civil Revision Petition filed questioning the orders passed in an I.A. in the said suit becomes infructuous .
4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI,J BRS