Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/81/2009 of SMT. SRIPADA SRINAGA VENKATA LAKSHMI POLAMBA Vs SRIPADA VENKATESWARLU on 6 April 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3572] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 81/2009
APHC010238172009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3572]
TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 81/2009
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SMT. SRIPADA SRINAGA VENKATA LAKSHMI POLAMBA, W/O VENKATESWARLU R/O PODAGATLAPALLI VILLAGE, RAVULAPALEM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT AND
1. SRIPADA VENKATESWARLU, S/o Somanna R/o Mogalikuduru Village, Mamidikuduru Mandal, East Godavari District.
...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2009(CMAMP 196 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pass an interim injunction against the respondent restraining him from marrying another woman pursuant to the order and decree of the Sneior Civil Judge, Kothapeta dated 31-12-2008 in OP.NO. 8 of 2008 during the pendency of this CMA, in the interest of justice Counsel for the Appellant:
1. K SARVA BHOUMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent:
1. P SURYA NARAYANA MURTHY The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI C.M.A.No.81 of 2009 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Balaji Medamalli)
On 18.02.2025, learned counsel for the appellant sought time to obtain instructions, as the matter had been listed after a long interval. On 03.02.2026 and 17.02.2026 as well, the appeal was adjourned on the same ground.
2. Today, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has addressed a letter to the appellant, however, no response has been received. On this ground, he seeks an adjournment of the matter.
3. However, as the learned counsel for the appellant reports no instructions, the C.M.A is dismissed for want of prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J
_____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI, J Date: 07.04.2026. Pab