Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/954/2012 of KOPPADI SRI LAKSHMI Vs KOPPADI BHAKTA MARKANDEYULU on 6 April 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3572] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 954/2012
APHC010541742012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 954/2012
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. KOPPADI SRI LAKSHMI, W/O BHAKTA MARKANDEYA, HOUSEWIFE R/O D.NO. 3-1-2, BOAT STREET, YANAM
...APPELLANT AND
1. KOPPADI BHAKTA MARKANDEYULU, S/o Venkata Narasimha Rao, Employee R/o PGannavaram Village & mandal, E.G. District Working at Special Main Irrigation Division, Rampachodavaram, E.G. District.
...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant:
1. B NAGA SAILAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent:
1. G L NAGESWAR RAO The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI C.M.A.No.954 of 2012 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Balaji Medamalli)
On 10.03.2026, this Court passed the following order: “The respondent has filed a petition under Section 13(1-A) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 to pass a decree of divorce and the same was allowed. Challenging the same, the wife filed the present appeal.
2. On 20.11.2012, an interim suspension was granted on the decree of divorce. Thereafter, as per the docket orders, the matter was referred to Lok Adalath, but the same could not be settled.
3. Considering the aforesaid and also that the appeal is listed after long time, granting one more opportunity to the learned counsel for the parties to appear and to argue the matter, post this matter after four (4) weeks.”
2. In spite of granting an opportunity to the learned counsel for the parties, there is no representation for the appellant today.
3. The C.M.A is dismissed for want of prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J
_____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI, J Date: 07.04.2026. Pab