Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/544/2020 of SIGURAPATI VENKATA RAMANA MURTHY Vs K MURALIDHAR REDDY on 6 April 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 544/2020 Between: 1. SIGURAPATI VENKATA RAMANA MURTHY, S/O. SUBBAIAH AGED 52
APHC010166342020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 544/2020
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SIGURAPATI VENKATA RAMANA MURTHY, S/O. SUBBAIAH AGED 52 YEARS, OCC CULTIATION, LAMPAKALOVA, PRATHIPADU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. K MURALIDHAR REDDY, ADDRESS DISTIRCT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI
2. PVV GOPALA KRISHNA, ADDRESS TASILDAR, ROUTHULAPALEV, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon the respondents and punish them for willful and deliberate violation of orders passed by this Honorable Court in WP.No. 9581 of 2020 dated 29.5.2020 and also direct the respondents to pay compensation to the petitioner for damaging his property Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V V SATISH Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following:
1. This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 29.05.2020 passed by this Court in W.P.No.9581 of 2020.
2. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that the main Writ Petition has already been disposed of by this Court.
3. In view of the disposal of the main Writ Petition, no further orders are required in this Contempt Case. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date :07.04.2026 klk
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
C.C. No.544 of 2020
07.04.2026 klk