Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/32209/2018 of K.C. Reddy Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences Vs All India Council for Technical Education on 6 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 32209/2018 Between: 1. K.C. REDDY INSTITUTE OF PHARMACEUTICAL

APHC010669712018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

WRIT PETITION NO: 32209/2018

Between:

1. K.C.

REDDY

INSTITUTE

OF

PHARMACEUTICAL

SCIENCES,

JANGAMGUNTLAPALEM

VILLAGE,

MEDIKONDURU

MANDEL,

GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. REP. BY ITS KOMMA REDDY LAKSHMA

REDDY.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION, NELSON

MANDELA MARG, VASANT KUNJ, NEW DELHI-110070, REP. BY ITS

MEMBER SECRETARY.

2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HIGHER EDUCATION

DEPARTMENT,

SECRETARIAT

BUILDINGS,

SECRETARIAT,

VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

3. THE CONVENOR, APPGECET, A.P. STATE COUNCIL OF HIGHER

EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH.

4. THE CONVENOR, EAMCET, A.P. STATE COUNCIL OF HIGHER

EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH.

5. THE SECRETARY, A.P. STATE COUNCIL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be

pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS, or any other appropriate writ or writs, declaring the Orders vide Lr.No.AICTE/AB/SCR/I-3513473869/2018-19 dated.24-07-2018

issued by the 1st respondent, putting the college under No Admission category as illegal unconstitutional contrary to the regulations and APHB

2017-18 and 2018-19 and contrary to the extension of approval granted for the academic year 2017-18 and consequently direct the respondent NO.1

AICTE to continue the extension of approval with 50 percent of intake of B.Pharmacy students i.e. 60 students in place of 120 students and in M.Pharmacy 24 students in place of 15 students of each course for the academic year 2018-19, consequently direct the other respondents No.2 to 5

to allot the students to the petitioner college through counseling, and may pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to DIRECT the Respondents No.2 to 5 to allot the B.Pharmacy students and M.Pharmacy students in each course for the academic year 2018-19 to the petitioner's college through counseling, pending disposal of the Writ Petition, and may pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to DIRECT the respondent No .1(AICTE) to continue the extension of approval with 50 percent of intake of B.pharmacy students i.e. 60 students in place of 120 students and in M.Pharmacy 15 students in place of 24 students in each course for the academic year 2018-19 in view of the orders of the Respondent No.1 vide F.No.AICTE/AB/SOUTH CENTRAL/P1D 1-6369181, dated.08-04- 2017, by suspending the impugned orders vide Lr.No.AICTE/AB/SCR/1- 3513473869/2018-19 dated.24-07-2018, pending disposal of the Writ Petition, and may pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. ELEVATED AS JUDGE

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. K RAMAKANTH REDDY

2. K RADHIKA

3. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION (AP)

The Court made the following:

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

WRIT PETITION NO.32209 OF 2018

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Smt K.Radhika, learned counsel appearing for Respondent Nos.3 to 5 on instructions would submit that in view of the subsequent developments happened during pendency of the Writ Petition and in the light of the impugned orders passed by this Court on 07.09.2018 at the stage of admission, no further adjudication is required in this Writ Petition and it has become infructuous.

2. In view of the same, placing the said statement on record, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

3. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

Dated: 07.04.2026 TM

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

WRIT PETITION NO: 32209 of 2018

Dated: 07.04.2026 TM

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead