Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/2066/2019 of PIDATALA SRIDEVI Vs THE STATE OF AP on 5 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 2066/2019 Between: 1. PIDATALA SRIDEVI, W/O RAMI REDDY, AGED 56 YEARS,

APHC010045582019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 2066/2019

Between:

1. PIDATALA SRIDEVI, W/O RAMI REDDY, AGED 56 YEARS, OCCUPATION.HOUSEWIFE, R/O

D.NO.

8-493,

ALMAASPET, KADAPA TOWN, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, LAND AND REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, V ELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA

3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KADAPA, YSR

KADAPA

4. THE TAHSILDAR, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring that the Endorsement Ref. No. A1686/2018 dated 31.01.2019 and the action of the 4th Respondent in not considering the petitioner's application and rejecting to issue Pattadar Passbooks in respect of petitioner’s land admeasuring Ac 1.88 cts in Sy. No. 352 at Chinnachowk Village, Kadapa District as illegal, highhanded, unconstitutional, deliberate, unwarranted,

unsustainable, arbitrary against Law as well as principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same and direct the respondents to issue Pattadar Passbooks and record the name of the petitioner in their records in respect of petitioner land.

IA NO: 1 OF 2019

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings Endorsement Ref. No. A/686/2018 dated. 31.01.2019 of 4th respondent by directing to issue Pass Books in respect of the petitioner's land admeasuring Ac 1.88 cts in Sy. No. 352 at Chinnachowk Village, Kadapa District.

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. K B RAMANNA DORA

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

The Court made the following

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Dasari Chandra Sekhar, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of Sri K.B. Ramanna Dora, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.

Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.

Consequently, Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date:06.04.2026 DSH

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead