Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/30192/2018 of B.Venkata Ramana Reddy, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 5 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 30192/2018 Between: 1. B.VENKATA RAMANA REDDY,, S/O. B. NARAYANA REDDY, AGED 43 YEARS,

APHC010632222018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 30192/2018

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. B.VENKATA RAMANA REDDY,, S/O. B. NARAYANA REDDY, AGED 43 YEARS, VIJALAPURAM VILLAGE AND POST, RAMAKUPPAM MANDAL, CHITOOR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,

REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR.

2. THE JOINT COLLECTOR/LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER/SUBCOLLECTOR, MADANAPALLI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ROADS AND BUILDINGS, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 are trying to laying road from Ankireddypalli Village to Santhipuram via Tellaguttalu in Sy.No.16-2A2 an extent of Ac.1.57 cents situated at Ankireddypalli Village, Ramakuppam Mandal, Chittoor District is illegal,

JS,J W.P.No.30192/2018

arbitrary, violation of Land Acquisition Act, 2013 and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's land in Sy.No.16-2A2 an extent of Ac.1.57 cents situated at Ankireddypalli Village, Ramakuppam Mandal, Chittoor District and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 not to interfere in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners' land in respect of Sy.No.16- 2A2 an extent of Ac.1.57 cents situated at Ankireddypalli Village, Ramakuppam Mandal, Chittoor District , pending disposal of above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. PRAKASH C Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION (AP)

2. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS (AP)

JS,J W.P.No.30192/2018

The Court made the following ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents.

2. This Court on 23.08.2018, passed interim order directing the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner’s possession and enjoyment over the subject land except by following due procedure contemplated under law.

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that in paragraph No.5 of the counter affidavit filed by the respondents, it is stated that respondents are laying road in the Government land classified as Bandi Daari Poramboke in Sy.No.16/1 of Ankireddigaripalle Village of Ramakuppam Mandal and not in the petitioner’s land.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in pursuance to the interim order passed by this Court, respondents are not interfering with the petitioner’s private property and he requested to record the averments of paragraph No.5 of the counter affidavit and close the writ petition.

5. In view of the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the averments made in paragraph No.5 of the counter affidavit, the Writ Petition is disposed of by making the interim order passed on 23.08.2018 absolute and directing the respondents not to take coercive steps against the petitioner except by following due procedure in accordance with law.

6. With these observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________

JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 06.04.2026

JS,J W.P.No.30192/2018

RSD

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 30192/2018

Dated: 06.04.2026

RSD

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead