Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRLRC/1133/2019 of Kangati Santosh Kumar Vs State of Andhra Pradesh, on 5 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA I.A.No.1 of 2019 IN / AND CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1133/2019 Between: KANGATI SANTOSH KUMAR,

APHC010352582019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

I.A.No.1 of 2019

IN / AND

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1133/2019

Between:

KANGATI SANTOSH KUMAR, S/O SURYA RAO AGED ABOUT 27

YEARS, OCC WORKER IN GOLD SHOP, R/O D. NO. 295, PHOOLBAGH COLONY, VIZIANAGARAM TOWN AND DISTRICT

...PETITIONER

AND

1. STATE

OF

ANDHRA

PRADESH,

REP.

BY

ITS

PUBLIC

PROSECUTOR,

HIGH

COURT

OF

ANDHRA

PRADESH,

AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. KANGATI DIVYA, W/O SANTOSH KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, HOUSE HOLD DUTIES, R/O D. NO. 13-2-28, OPP. SRI

VENKATESWARA

SWAMY

TEMPLE,

MODETI

VEEDHI,

SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT.

3. KANGATI HANOK KUMAR, S/O SANTOSH KUMAR AGED ABOUT 2

YEARS, RESIDING AT REST -DO. (BEING MINORS REP. BY HIS

MOTHER SMT. KANGATI DIVYA W/O SANTOSH KUMAR RD

PETITIONER HEREIN).

...RESPONDENT(S):

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. G UMAPATHI SASTRY

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

2. ELEVATED AS JUDGE

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

COMMON ORDER:

The instant Criminal Revision Case under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C has been filed by the Petitioner seeking to set aside the Order dated 13.12.2018 passed in M.C.No.10 of 2018 on the file of the Court of Family Judge-cum-III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Srikakulam.

2. I.A.No.1 of 2019 is filed by the Petitioner seeking to condone the delay of 198 days in filing the above Criminal Revision Case. Despite matter is posed under the caption “for dismissal”, none represented the Petitioner.

3. Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor is in attendance.

4. In that view, I.A.No.1 of 2019 is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, the Criminal Revision Case is closed. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:06.04.2026 Dinesh

HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

Crl.R.C.No.1133 of 2019

Dt.06.04.2026

Dinesh

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead