Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/10856/2019 of Sri Sripathi Sunil Barnabas Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 5 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 10856/2019 Between: 1. SRI SRIPATHI SUNIL BARNABAS, S/O S.V.PRATHAP AGE 46 YEARS, JUNIOR
APHC010243072019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 10856/2019
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SRI SRIPATHI SUNIL BARNABAS, S/O S.V.PRATHAP AGE 46 YEARS, JUNIOR LECTURER, GOVERNMENT JUNIOR COLLEGE VEMULA KADAPA DISTRICT R/O D.NO.43/37 PRAKASH NAGAR, KADAPA
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPTD BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI VILLAGE, AMARAVATHY MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KADAPA
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order direction or a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent no.2 in not giving any information to the writ petitioner in pursuance of the legal notice dt.14-4-2019 issued by the writ petitioner to the 2nd respondent as illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to provide the required information to the writ petitioner as required by the writ petitioner stated in his legal notice dt. 14-4- 2019 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to provide the required information to the writ petitioner as required by the writ petitioner stated in his legal notice dt. 14- 4¬2019 and to pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. S S BHATT Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following ORDER:
Ms.Lakshmi Nandini, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 06.04.2026 rsd
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 10856/2019
Date: 06.04.2026 rsd