Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/42285/2018 of Mallisetti Ramachandra Rao Vs The Tahsildar on 5 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 42285/2018 Between: 1. MALLISETTI RAMACHANDRA RAO, S/O RAMULU AGE. 58 YEARS, OCC.HEAD
APHC010877282018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 42285/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. MALLISETTI RAMACHANDRA RAO, S/O RAMULU AGE. 58 YEARS, OCC.HEAD MASTER R/O D.NO.10-104, BESIDES MILK, COOLING CENTRE, BHIMADOLE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE TAHSILDAR, BHIMADOLU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI , WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
3. THE ZILLA PRAJA PARISHAD, REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
4. THE HEAD MASTER, AP HIGH SCHOOL, BHIMADOLU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BHIMADOLU POLICE STATION, BHIMADOLU WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
6. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AMARAVATHI , KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order, or Direction, more particularly one in nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents No.1 and 2 in taking steps to demolish the Petitioners House No.10-104, in 0.10 cents of land in RS.No.64/1 situated besides Milk, Cooling Centre, Bhimadolu , Bhimadole Mandal, West Godavari District, without Notice or opportunity or without following due Rrocess of law as bad in law and violative of principles of Natural Justice and consequently restrain the Respondents from demolishing/dispossessing the Petitioner from House No.10-104, in 0.10 cents of land in RS.No.64/1 situated besides Milk, Cooling Centre, Bhimadolu , Bhimadole Mandal, West Godavari District, in the interest of Justice, Pending Disposal of the Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to restrain the Respondents from demolishing/dispossessing the Petitioner from House No.10-104, in 0.10 cents of land in RS.No.64/1 situated beside Milk, Cooling Centre, Bhimadolu , Bhimadole Mandal, West Godavari District, in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. B SUDHAKAR REDDY AND NEERAJA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
3. N SRIHARI (Standing Counsel for ZPP MPP and GRAM PANCHAYAT)
The Court made the following ORDER:
Sri.S.Bhaskar, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 06.04.2026 rsd
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 42285/2018
Date: 06.04.2026 rsd