Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/2730/2019 of NAGAMANI Vs THE STATE OF AP on 5 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 2730/2019 Between: 1. NAGAMANI, W/O. LATE SUBRAMANYAM AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 0CC. HOUSE
APHC010059752019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 2730/2019
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. NAGAMANI, W/O. LATE SUBRAMANYAM AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 0CC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. RAMAKUPPARN VILLAGE AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
2. N.THUSALI, W/O. SRINATHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC.HOUSE WIFE, R/O. 90, BANDARLAPALLI, RAMAKUPPARN MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
3. C.RAMADEVI, W/O. C.S.PRATHAP REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 0CC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O.RAMAKUPPAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
4. MOHAMMED ASIF, S/O.ABDUL KUDHEESH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, 0CC LABOUR, R/O.RAMAKUPPAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
5. ABDUL WAHID, S/O. LATE M.REHMAN SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 0CC. LABOUR, R/O. MOSQUE STREE, RAMAKUPPARN VILLAGE AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER/SUBCOLLECTOR, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
4. THE TAHSILDAR, RAMAKUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
5. THE SUB REGISTRAR, KUPPAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
6. KESAVA REDDY, S/O.KRISHNA REDDY, MITTAPALLI VILLAGE, RAMAKUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
7. B V MURAII KRISHNA, S/O.A.VISWANATHA SETTY, NEW BUS STAND ROAD, RAMAKUPPAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Wirt of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 to 5 not to entertain the any registration pending disposal of the suit OS No.6/2018 including vide document No. 290/2019, Dt. 23.01.2019 is illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice consequently direct the respondents to stay of all further proceedings in Sy.No. 117/3 and Sy.No.577 situated at 90 Bandarlapalli Village, Ramakuppam Mandal, Chittoor District forthwith, IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in Sy.No. 117/3 and Sy.No.577 situated at 90 Bandarlapalli Village, Ramakuppam Mandal, Chittoor District, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. PRAKASH C Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. P HEMACHANDRA
2. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP)
The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 06.04.2026 rsd
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 2730/2019
Date: 06.04.2026 rsd