Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/13307/2019 of Gali Nagendar Reddy Vs State of Andhra Pradesh on 5 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 13307/2019 Between: 1. GALI NAGENDAR REDDY, S/O. NAGIREDDY, AGED 47 YEARS, OCC.
APHC010289132019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 13307/2019
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. GALI NAGENDAR REDDY, S/O. NAGIREDDY, AGED 47 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, RIO. PALLEPALEM ROAD, PEDDAGANJAM VILLAGE, CHINAGANJAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
2. GALI VENKATA SUBBAREDDY, S/O. NAGIREDDY, AGED 43 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O. PALLEPALEM ROAD, PEDDAGANJAM VILLAGE, CHINAGANJAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE.
3. THAHSILDAR, CHINAGANJAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
4. MANDAL SURVEYOR, CHINAGANJAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
5. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHINAGANJAM POLICE STATION, CHINAGANJAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
6. ASODI BIKSHALU REDDY, S/O. SREE RAMULUREDDY, AGED 54 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O. PALLEPALEM ROAD, PEDDAGANJAM VILLAGE, CHINAGANJAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents, particularly respondents 3 to 5 in insisting the petitioners to give up a portion of their house site to an extent of one cent from and out of their house and site plot admeasuring Ac. 0.04 cents in Sy. Nos. 610/1 and 611/4 of Pedhaganjam Revenue Village in Chinaganjam Mandal of Prakasam District, as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, without any authority of law and violative of principles of natural justice and offends Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interefere in any manner with the petitioners' aforesaid house and site property IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents particularly respondents 3 to 5 not to interfere in any manner with the petitioners' possession over their house and site property admeasuring Ac. 0.04 cents in Sy. Nos. 610/1 and 611/4 of Pedhaganjam Revenue Village in Chinaganjam Mandal of Prakasam District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following ORDER:
Ms.T.Surya Chaitanya learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 06.04.2026 rsd
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 13307/2019
Date: 06.04.2026 rsd