Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/358/2026 of NUKA PAPUGARI JAIPAL REDDY Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 5 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 358/2026 Between: NUKA PAPUGARI JAIPAL REDDY, S/O SUBRAMANYAM REDDY,
APHC010174222026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 358/2026
Between:
NUKA PAPUGARI JAIPAL REDDY, S/O SUBRAMANYAM REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, RESIDING AT D.NO. 7/63, 7TH WARD, OBULAVARIPALLI,TOWN AND MANDAL, ANNAMAIAH DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF AMARAVATHI.
2. NANDALURUISUBRAMANYAM REDDY, S/O SUBBARAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, RESIDING AT BADIVANDLAPALLI
VILLAGE, H/O RAGHAVARAJAPURAM POST, RAILWAY KODUR
MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
VMR LEGAL
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The instant Criminal Revision Case under Sections 438 and 442 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) has been filed by the Petitioner / Appellant seeking to set aside the Order dated 16.03.2026 in Crl.M.P.No.7 of 2026 in Crl.M.P.No.2 of 2026 in Crl.A.No.87 of 2025 on the file of the Court of III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Rajampet.
2. Sri Venkatesh B. Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, since the Petitioner is an agriculturist and has suffered business losses, he could not deposit the 20% of the compensation amount as ordered by the learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Rajampet in Crl.M.P.No.2 of 2026, dated 09.01.2026, which is also confirmed by the learned Judge vide order dated 16.03.2026 in Crl.M.P.No.7 of 2026. Hence, prayed to set aside the impugned order.
3. Sri K.Sandeep, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for State would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders.
4. Considering the submissions made, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of extending the time for depositing 20% of the compensation amount, till 06.05.2026.
Pending applications, if any, shall stands closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:06.04.2026 Dinesh
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Crl.R.C.No.358 of 2026
Dt.06.04.2026
Dinesh