Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/564/2024 of Tenali Ratna Babu, Vs Tenali Rajani Ememma, on 5 April 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3572] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 564/2024
APHC010329832024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 564/2024
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. TENALI RATNA BABU,, S/O PETER JOHN, C/O CHINNAM YESSUPADAM, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS. PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, D.NO.4-127,MENTHAVARI THOTA, BHIMAVARAM, BJCJC, WEST GODAVARI, AND PRESENT ADDRESS H.NO - 4-127, AMBEDKAR COLONY, SARIPALLI (VILLAGE), GANAPAVARAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH -534198.
...APPELLANT AND
1. TENALI RAJANI EMEMMA, W/o Ratna Babu, D/o.Pakarla Prasad, aged about 39 years, D.No.22-8/11, Housing Board Colony, Near Saint Marys School, Near Park, Bhimavaram, BJCJC. West Godavari, Counsel for the Appellant:
1. NARESH BABU YERICHERLA Counsel for the Respondent:
1. Y N ANJANEYACHARYULU The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
I.A.No.1 of 2024 IN/AND C.M.A.No.564 of 2024 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)
The appeal has been filed by the husband. His petition seeking divorce under Section 10(1) (ix) (x) of the Indian Divorce Act, was dismissed.
2. The appeal has been filed with delay of 227 days. I.A.No.1 of 2024 has been filed to condone the said delay.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant, has submitted a letter dated 02.04.2026, to the Registrar (Judicial), requesting that the appeal be listed under the caption ‘for withdrawal’ as the appellant is inclined to withdraw the appeal.
4. Sri Kashapogu Suresh, learned counsel for the appellant, is present and submits that the C.M.A. may be dismissed as withdrawn, as the parties intend to settle the dispute amicably by filing an application for divorce by mutual consent.
5. Recording the same, I.A.No.1 of 2024 and the C.M.A are dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J
_____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI, J Date: 06.04.2026. Pab