Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/7300/2019 of Morampalli Bayanna, Vs State of Andhra Prathsh on 5 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 7300/2019 Between: 1. MORAMPALLI BAYANNA,, S/O YERRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC. -
APHC010169462019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF
ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 7300/2019
Between:
1. MORAMPALLI BAYANNA,, S/O YERRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65
YEARS,
OCC.
-
AGRICULTURE,
RIO.
SEELAMVARIPALLI
HARIJANAWADA,
81,
UPPARAPALLI
VILLAGE,
SOMALA
MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE.
2. SMT. MORAMPALLI RAJAMMA,, W/O. MORAMPALLI BAYANNA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCC. - AGRICULTURE, R/O.
SEELAMVARIPALLI
HARIJANAWADA,
81,
UPPARAPALLI
VILLAGE, SOMALA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA
PRADESH STATE.
3. SMT. M. LAKSHMI DEVI,, W/O. RAMACHANDRA AND D/O.
MORAMPALLI BAYANNA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC. - AGRICULTURE, R/O. SEELAMVARIPALLI HARIJANAWADA, 81, UPPARAPALLI
VILLAGE,
SOMALA
MANDAL,
CHITTOOR
DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRATHSH, REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
REVENUE
DEPARTMENT,
JS,J
W.P.No.7300 of 2019
SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI,
AMARAVATHI,
GUNTUR
DISTRICT.
2. THE
DISTRICT
COLLECTOR,
CHITTOOR
DISTRICT
AT
CHITTOOR.
3. THE SUBCOLLECTOR, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
4. THE TAHSILDAR, SOMALA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
5. SMT M ESWARAMMA, W/O. LATE NAGULAPPA, AGED MAJOR, R/O. THANGELIMITTA, SOMALA MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, or order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction on the part of the 3rd respondent in not disposing of the appeal in R.O.C.
A/50/2019 as highly illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and also violative of Principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 3rd respondent herein to dispose of the appeal in R.O.C. No. A/50/2019 filed by the petitioners herein for cancellation of the pattadar pass books and title deed books issued in favour of the 5th respondent herein in respect of agricultural lands i.e. an extent of Ac.2-92 Cents in Sy. No. 175/2, an extent of Ac.1-85 Cents in Sy. No. 175/2, an extent of Ac.3-84 Cents in Sy.
No. 175/4, an extent of Ac.2-40 Cents in Sy. No. 177/2 and an extent of Ac.2-00 Cents in Sy. No. 177/5, total admeasuring Ac.13- 51 Cents situated at Thangellamitta, 81, Upparapalli Vilage, Somala Mandal, Chittoor District IA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 4 herein not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners herein in respect of
JS,J
W.P.No.7300 of 2019
their agricultural lands i.e. an extent of Ac.2-92 Cents in Sy. No. 175/2; an extent of Ac.1-85 Cents in Sy. No., 175/2; an extent of Ac.3-84 Cents in Sy. No. 175/4; an extent of Ac.2-40 Cents in Sy. No. 177/2 and an extent of Ac.2-00 Cents in Sy. No. 177/5, total admeasuring Ac.13-51 Cents situated at Thangellamitta, 81, Upparapalli Vilage, Somala Mandal, Chittoor District by permitting the petitioners herein to enter into their lands for harvesting the standing mango and paddy crops, pending disposal of the writ petition, in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. K SRINIVAS
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
This Court made the following:
JS,J
W.P.No.7300 of 2019
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned Assistant Government Pleader representing the respondents, on instructions, submitted that due to the reorganization of Districts and Divisions in the State, the appeal is transferred to Pileru Revenue Division. Consequently, the Assistant Government Pleader requested that the writ petition may be disposed of by directing the Sub- Collector, Pileru, to pass orders on the appeal filed by the petitioners.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has consented to the disposal of the writ petition, provided a specific timeframe is fixed.
3. Since the grievance of the writ petitioner concerns the passing of order on the appeal that has been pending with the 3rd respondent for the past seven years, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the 3rd respondent to dispose of the appeal within three (3) months from today.
4. With this observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 6th April, 2026 cbs
JS,J W.P.No.7300 of 2019
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION No.7300 of 2019
6th April, 2026 cbs