Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/7088/2026 of D RAMANJANEYULU Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 5 April 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 7088/2026 Between: 1. D RAMANJANEYULU, S/O YESURATNAM, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/O
APHC010128202026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO: 7088/2026
Between:
1. D RAMANJANEYULU, S/O YESURATNAM, AGED ABOUT 57
YEARS
R/O
18-36,SAINIKHITHA
RESIDENCY,SANTHINAGAR,
KT,
ROAD
TIRUPATHI
URBAN,CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI- 522238.
2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRAPRADESH
SPECIAI PROTECTION FORCE APSPF VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA
PRADESH,
AT
MANGALAGIRI,
GUNTUR
DISTRICT-522503.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the 2nd Respondent in implementing the
orders issued by the 1st Respondent in G.O.Rt.No.329, Home (Services- III) Department, dated 12.03.2024 and the consequential Memo No.2267993/Ser.l/A2/2023 dated 23.09.2025, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law, and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to implement the said Government Order and Memo and extend all consequential service benefits to the Petitioner within a reasonable time, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 27.12.2025 forthwith to implement the orders issued by the 1st Respondent in G.O.Rt.No.329, Home (Services-lll) Department, dated 12.03.2024
and
the
consequential
Memo
No.2267993/Ser.l/A2/2023 dated 23.09.2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. BHARGAV THIMMARAJU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES I
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking to declaring the action of the respondents in not implementing the orders issued by the 1st respondent in G.O.Rt.No.329
dated 12.03.2024 and consequential Memo dated 23.09.2025 as illegal and arbitrary.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that after filing the writ petition, the 2nd respondent has passed the order dated 18.03.2026 by releasing the increments to the petitioner and hence no further orders are required to be passed in the matter.
3. Recording the same, the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
Date:06.04.2026 GK
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO:7088 of 2026
Dated:06.04.2026
GK