Andhra Pradesh High Court
LAAS/716/2007 of Velugubanti Srirama Rao Vs THE LAO & SPL. DY. COLLECTOR, E.G.DIST. on 1 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 716/2007 Between: 1. VELUGUBANTI SRIRAMA RAO, SON OF VENKATA RAO HINDU AGED ABOUT MAJOR RESIDENCE OF D NO 7 DOWLESWARAM,
APHC010249822007
IN TH
THURSD
TWO
THE HONOURABLE SR
THE HONOURAB
LAND ACQ
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. VELUGUBANTI SR AGED ABOUT MA DOWLESWARAM,
2. VELUGUBANTI SA RAO HINDU MAJ DOWLESWARAM,
1. THE LAO SPL DY
Counsel for the Appella
1. T V S PRABHAKAR Counsel for the Respon
1. E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) DAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT RI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVEND BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR G QUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 716/20 RIRAMA RAO, SON OF VENKATA AJOR RESIDENCE OF D NO 7-54 V EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ATYANARAYANA MURTHY, SON JOR D NO 7-54 RESIDENCE O EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...A AND Y COLLECTOR E G DIST, - ...R ant(S): RA RAO ndent:
DESH
DRANATH ROY GEDELA
A RAO HINDU VEMAGIRI VIA OF VENKATA OF VEMAGIRI APPELLANT(S) RESPONDENT
CMR,J & GTK,J L.A.A.S.No.716 of 2007
The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)
There is no representation on behalf of the appellants. Previously also, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants.
2. Therefore, it is evident that the appellants are not evincing interest to pursue this appeal of the year 2007.
3. Therefore, the Land Acquisition Appeal Suit is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
_____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
Date: 02.04.2026 MDP