Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/8886/2026 of Sri Lakshmi Venkateswara Agencies, Vs IKF Home Finance Limited, on 1 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3575] THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT WRIT PETITION NO: 8886/2026 Between: 1. SRI LAKSHMI VENKATESWARA AGENCIES,, REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR NARALA EESWARA RAO S/O NARALA RAMANJANEYULU, AGED
APHC010177262026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
WRIT PETITION NO: 8886/2026
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SRI LAKSHMI VENKATESWARA AGENCIES,, REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR NARALA EESWARA RAO
S/O NARALA RAMANJANEYULU, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O D NO. 1-180A, MAIN ROAD, JAGANADHARGIRI JAGGANNA DHAGIRI VILLAGE, KAJULURU MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 533 468. (PETITIONER/PERSONAL GUARANTOR/DEBTOR)
...PETITIONER AND
1. IKF HOME FINANCE LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY/ BRANCH MANAGER, 1ST FLOOR, ABOVE AYE FINANCE, RAIDU GUDA, HYDERABAD - 500 081, TELANGANA STATE. (CORPORATE OFFICE 10TH FLOOR, TOWER-3, EQUINOX BUSINESS PARK, LBS MARG, KURLA WEST, MUMBAI - 400 070).
2. UNION OF INDIA, REP BY ITS FINANCE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI
...RESPONDENT(S):
CORAM: HON’BLE Mrs. JUSTICE LISA GILL
HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Present: Mr. P.Padmakar, Advocate for petitioner. ***
WP-8886-2026
LISA GILL, J.
Learned counsel for petitioner after arguing for some time seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to petitioner to avail remedy (ies) available to it in accordance with law.
2. Accordingly, Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforementioned. No costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications are disposed of, accordingly.
(LISA GILL) JUDGE
(NINALA JAYASURYA) JUDGE Date: 02.04.2026 Ksj