Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/652/2024 of MD. YASEEN BABA Vs SMT. MOHAMMED FATHIMA BIBI @ BIBI FATHIMA on 1 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 652/2024 Between: MD. YASEEN BABA, S/O LATE SUBHAN, AGED 53 YEARS,
APHC010303862024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 652/2024
Between:
MD. YASEEN BABA, S/O LATE SUBHAN, AGED 53 YEARS, WORKING
AS GENERATOR ASSISTANT, ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT, ANDHRA
UNIVERSITY, RESIDENT OF D.NO. 7-13-7, FF, ANDHRA UNIVERSITY
OUT GATE DOWN, 3RD LANE, CHINA WALTAIR, VISAKHAPATNAM.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SMT MOHAMMED FATHIMA BIBI BIBI FATHIMA, W/O MD. YASEEN
BABA, AGED 36 YEARS, RESIDING AT D.NO. 9-9-46- 2/1, MANGAPURAM COLONY, NEAR TARA MASJID, PITHAPURAM
COLONY BESIDE, VISAKHAPATNAM - 17.
2. BABY MOHAMMED SAMEERA, D/O MD. YASEEN BABA, AGED 18
YEARS,
MINOR,
REPRESENTED
BY
HER
MOTHER
I.E.
MOHAMMED FATHIMA BIBI @ BIBI FATHIMA.
3. BABY MOHAMMED ANEESH, , D/O MD. YASEEN BABA, AGED 16
YEARS, MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS MOTHER I.E. MOHAMMED
FATHIMA BIBI @ BIBI FATHIMA.
4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY THE PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., AMARAVATHI
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
K MUNI REDDY BALA PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The instant Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 438 and 442 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) seeking to set aside the order dated 04.04.2024 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Visakhapatnam in Crl.M.P.No.39 of 2023 in Crl.A.No.548 of 2023.
2. Heard Sri K.Muni Reddy Bala Prasad, learned counsel for the Petitioner.
3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that this revision is preferred against the order dated 04.04.2024 in Crl.M.P.No.39 of 2023 in Crl.A.No.548. It is further submitted that in D.V.C.No.24 of 2015 an amount of Rs.10,000/- per month was granted as maintenance apart from the compensation. When the Petitioner filed Crl.M.P.No.39 of 2023 setting stay of the order passed by the trial Court, the said petition was dismissed by the learned Appellate Judge. Learned counsel would further submit that the Petitioner is visually challenged and working in Electricity Department, Andhra University. It is further submitted that, apart from the maintenance granted in D.V.C., Rs.10,000/- per month was also granted in the Maintenance Case. It is submitted that a direction may be given to the Appellate Court for expeditious disposal of the appeal if this Court is not inclined to interfere in the impugned order.
4. Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor is in attendance.
5. Considering the submissions made, since the main appeal is pending before the Appellate Court, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of and the learned Appellate Judge is directed to disposal of Crl.A.No.548 of 2023 as expeditiously as possible, but not later than two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
Pending applications, if any, shall stands closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:02.04.2026 Dinesh
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Crl.R.C.No.652 of 2024
Dt.02.04.2026
Dinesh