Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/16779/2025 of RAYUDU NAGALAKSHMI Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 1 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 16779/2025 Between: 1. RAYUDU NAGALAKSHMI, W/O. NAGENDRA BABU, AGED 35 YEARS, OCC
APHC010328722025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 16779/2025
Between:
1. RAYUDU NAGALAKSHMI, W/O. NAGENDRA BABU, AGED 35
YEARS,
OCC
FAIR
PRICE
SHOP
DEALER,
R/O
CHAKRAYAPALEM VILLAGE, ADDANKI MANDAL, BAPATIA
DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, CIVIL SUPPLY DEPARTMENT
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVTI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR C S WING, BAPATLA DISTRICT AT
BAPATLA.
3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR C S WING, BAPATLA DISTRICT AT
BAPATLA.
4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHIRALA DIVISION AT
CHIRALA, BAPATLA DISTRICT.
5. THE TAHSILDAR, ADDANKI MANDAL AT ADDANKI, BAPATLA
DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
6. THE DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER, BAPATLA DISTRICT AT
BAPATLA.
7. DODDA YUVARAJ, S/O. ANJANEYULU, AGED 36 YEARS, OCC
EX. F.P. SHOP DEALER, R/O. CHAKRAYAPALEM VILLAGE, ADDANKI
MANDAL,
BAPATLA
DISTRICT,
ERSTWHILE
PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the Order, dated 30.05.2025 in L.Dis.H/548/2024 passed by the 4th Respondent whereby directing the Respondent No. 5 and 6 to supply essential commodities to 7th Respondent without there being specific direction from this Honble Court in W.R No. 3086 of 2016, as illegal, irregular, irrational and offends Articles 14, 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the direct the Respondents more particularly Respondent Nos 4 to 6 to supply essential commodities to the Petitioner for distribution to card holders, and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to suspend the operation of Order, dated 30.05.2025 in L.Dis.H/548/2024 passed by the 4th Respondent and consequently direct the Respondent No’s 4 to 6 to supply essential commodities to the Petitioner for distribution to card holders , pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PALA KARTHI KIRAN
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Sri Pala Karthi Kiran, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Date: 02ndApril, 2026
RKS