Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/1186/2023 of GOLLAPALLI DANIAL Vs G SAI PRASAD,I.A.S on 1 April 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1186/2023 Between: 1. GOLLAPALLI DANIAL, S/O.(LATE) NARAYANA MURTHY, AGED 58
APHC010076622023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1186/2023
Between:
1. GOLLAPALLI DANIAL, S/O.(LATE) NARAYANA MURTHY, AGED 58 YEARS, R/O D.NO.10-35, 80/2, VUDA COLONY, BHEEMUNIPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. G SAI PRASAD I A S, S/ O. NOT KNOWN, AGE NOT
KNOWN,
REVENUE
SECRETARY,
REVENUE
DEPARTMENT,
STATE
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. SRI G SAI PRASAD IAS, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGE NOT
KNOWN,
CHIEF
COMMISSIONER
OF
LAND
ADMINISTRATION,
A.P.
MANGALAGIRI,
GUNTUR
DISTRICT.
3. DR A MALLIKARJUNA IAS, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGE NOT
KNOWN,
DISTRICT
COLLECTOR,
VISAKHAPATNAM
DISTRICT.
4. SRI PAUL KIRAN, , S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGE NOT KNOWN, TAHSILDAR, VISAKHAPATNAM RURAL, VISAKHAPATNAM
DISTRICT.
5. SRI THARAKESH, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGE NOT KNOWN, SUB REGISTRAR, MADHURAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM
DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to call the respondents and punish them for their deliberate disobedience in non compliance of the orders passed in W.P.No.22045 of 2022 dt 25-7-2022 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SRINIVASA RAO MADIRAJU
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. B S SHIVAJI
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This contempt case is filed for non implementation of the order dated 25.07.2022, passed by this Court in W.P.No.22045 of 2022.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order dated 25.07.2022, passed by this Court in W.P.No.22045 of 2022, has been complied with.
3. Recording the same, the contempt case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
Date:02.04.2026 GK
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
CONTEMPT CASE NO:1186 of 2023
Dated:02.04.2026
GK