Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/19652/2019 of Thunga Balakrishna @ T Balakrishnaiah, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 1 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 19652/2019 Between: 1. THUNGA BALAKRISHNA @ T BALAKRISHNAIAH,, S/O. T. PENCHALAIAH,
APHC010409652019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 19652/2019
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. THUNGA BALAKRISHNA @ T BALAKRISHNAIAH,, S/O. T. PENCHALAIAH,
HINDU, AGED ABOUT
YEARS, R/O. THUMMACHETLAPALLI POST AND VILLAGE, CHITVELLI MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
4. THE TAHSILDAR, TIRUPATHI RURAL MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
5. K BHASKAR NAIDU, S/O. K. PEDDAIAH NAIDU, HINDU, R/O.D.NO.2- 14413, SRI LAKSHMI NAGAR, M. R. PALLI, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
6. N SUBRAMANYAM, S/O. N. CHANGALRAYULU, HINDU, R/O.22-19- 19/A1, RAVINDRA NAGAR, RENIGUNTA ROAD, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
7. GALI CHINNA REDDEMMA, W/O. G. ADI NARAYANA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.1-1142, BANDLAVANKA VILLAGE,
JS,J W.P.No.19652/2019
PILET POST, PILER MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
8. K REDDEMMA, W/O. K. BHASKAR NAIDU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, RIO.D.NO.2-14413, SRI LAKSHMI NAGAR, M. R. PALLI, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an Order, Direction or Writ, more particularly a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th Respondent in mutating the land in Sy. No.249/4 to an extent of 0.61.30 cents and in Sy.No. 249/5 to an extent of 0.20.20 cents in favor of Respondents no. 5 to 8 as illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary and contrary to the orders passed in I.A.no.383 of 2019 in O.S.No. 98 of 2019, dated 05-11-2019 on the file of 3rd Additional District Judge, Tirupathi against the respondents 2, 4 to 8 and without jurisdiction. further declare that the Petitioner is entitled for the land in question IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th Respondent not to mutate the names of Respondents. No. 5 to 8 in respect of the land in Sy.No.249/4 to an extent of 0.61.30 cents and in sy 249/5 to an extent of 0.20.20 cents forthwith, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K RAMAMOHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
2. VENKATESWARLU SANISETTY
JS,J W.P.No.19652/2019
The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a Court slip dated 01.04.2026 before this Court, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 02.04.2026
RSD
JS,J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 19652/2019
Dated: 02.04.2026 RSD