Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/5926/2022 of KONAKALLA CHIRANJEEVARAO Vs G.SAI PRASAD I.A.S., on 1 April 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5926/2022 Between: 1. KONAKALLA CHIRANJEEVARAO, S/O DASHARADHI ESWARA RAO,
APHC010669462022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5926/2022
Between:
1. KONAKALLA
CHIRANJEEVARAO,
S/O
DASHARADHI
ESWARA RAO, AGED 44 YEARS, OCC. SOFTWARE
ENGINEER H.NO.3-499, SRI KALI GARDENS ASHRAM, PEDDAKAKANI VILLAGE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA
PRADESH.
2. CHITTURI LAXMI PADMAJA, D/O DASHARADHI ESWARA
RAO, AGED 51 YEARS, H.NO.3-499, SRI KALI GARDENS
ASHRAM, PEDDAKAKANI VILLAGE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
3. VOORA USHARANI, D/O DASHARADHI ESWARA RAO, AGED.46 YEARS, H.NO.3-499, SRI KALI GARDENS
ASHRAM, PEDDAKAKANI VILLAGE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
4. KAMBAMPATI VIJAYALAKSHMI, D/O SRI RAMARAO, AGED
58 YEARS, H.NO.4-301, MASTAN MANYAM COLONY, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
5. KATLAMUDI YASVATHI NIRMALA, D/O SRI RAMARAO, AGED 56 YEARS, H.NO.4-301,MASTAN MANYAM COLONY, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. G SAI PRASAD I A S, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGE NOT KNOWN, PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
2. S DILLI RAO I A S, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGE NOT KNOWN, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA
PRADESH.
3. SMT PRASANNA LAKSHMI, D/O NOT KNOWN, AGE NOT
KNOWN, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUVURU, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
4. SMT KHALI LAKSHMI, D/O NOT KNOWN, AGE NOT
KNOWN, TAHSILDAR, VISSANNAPET MANDAL, KRISHNA
DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to call the respondents and punish them for their willful and deliberate disobedience action in not complying with the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.17209 of 2022, dated. 01-07-2022, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. P S P SURESH KUMAR
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. P SUBASH
2.
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This contempt case is filed for non implementation of the order dated 01.07.2022, passed by this Court in W.P.No.17209 of 2022.
2. After notice, the 4th contemnor has filed reply affidavit annexing the endorsement dated 16.08.2022.
3. On perusal of the same, this Court is of the view that there is no willful disobedience of the order dated 01.07.2022, passed by this Court in W.P.No.17209 of 2022.
4. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. If the petitioners have any grievance, they may assail the same in a separate proceedings. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
Date:02.04.2026 GK
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
CONTEMPT CASE NO:5926 of 2022
Dated:02.04.2026
GK