Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/6122/2019 of Pilla Suryakumari Vs THE STATE OF AP on 1 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 6122/2019 Between: 1. PILLA SURYAKUMARI, , WIFE OF P.V.R.NAIDU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 57
APHC010139182019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 6122/2019
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. PILLA SURYAKUMARI, , WIFE OF P.V.R.NAIDU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, D.NO.9-19-46/2, FLAT NO.501, VINAYAGHAR VIJAYALAKSHMI APARTMENT, C.B.M. COMPOUND, VISAKHAPATNAM- 530 003, ANDHRA PRADESH .STATE.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REPTD. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE (LAND ACQUISITION) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI AT AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST., ANDHRA PRADESH STATE.
2. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY, LAND ACQUISITION, NATIONAL HIGHWAYS ' AUTHORITY OF INDIA, VISAKHAPATNAM, A.NDHRA PRADESH STATE.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ order or direction, more particularly a writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent No. 2 in disposing of the representation given by the petitioner herein on 06-06-2018 which was received by the respondents as unjust and illegal and further direct the respondents to consider and dispose of the above representations given
JS, J W.P.No.6122/2019
by the petitioner dt. 06-06-2018 in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent No.2 to consider and dispose of the representation dt. 06-06-2018 which was sent by the petitioner under registered post with ack. due and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K VENKATESH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION (AP)
JS, J W.P.No.6122/2019
The Court made the following ORDER:
Sri.M.Babji, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 02.04.2026 rsd
JS, J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 6122/2019
Date: 02.04.2026 rsd