Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/1763/2024 of GUNTUPALLI PAMULU Vs GUMMADI SEETHARAMAIAH on 1 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1763/2024 Between: 1. GUNTUPALLI PAMULU, S/O CHINA APPAIAH, AGED 70 YEARS,
APHC010334422024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1763/2024
Between:
1. GUNTUPALLI PAMULU, S/O CHINA APPAIAH, AGED 70 YEARS, R/O.
DR.NO.
4-39B,
CHINTAPALLIPADU
VILLAGE,
VATTICHERUKURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. GUMMADI SEETHARAMAIAH, S/o. Tirupataiah, aged 58 years R/o.
Chintapallipadu Village, Vatticherkuru Mandal, Guntur District.
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased topleased to set aside the order and decree dated order and decree dated 9.7.2024 passed in I.A.No. 207 of 2024 in O.S.No. 658 of 2017 on the file of the I Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Guntur, Guntur District and allow the Civil Revision Petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings in O.S.No. 658 of 2017 on the file of the I Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Guntur, Guntur District, pending disposal of the Civil Revision Petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MARELLA RADHA
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. CHILUKURI NARENDRA BABU
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Sri N.Venkatesh, learned counsel representing Sri Marella Radha, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that they have instructions to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition on the ground that the petitioner has filed an interlocutory application i.e., I.A.No.229 of 2026 in O.S.No.658 of 2017 under Order XVI Rule 6 of CPC on 17.03.2026 before the Court below, and sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Date: 02nd April, 2026 JLV
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1763/2024
Date: 02nd April, 2026 JLV