Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/13428/2021 of B RAVI KUMAR Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 1 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3575] THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX WRIT PETITION NO: 13428/2021 Between: 1. B RAVI KUMAR, B. RAMA SWAMY, AGED 52 YRS., OCCUPATION BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO. 1-1-4-7AND9, VR STREET, BELLARY ROAD,
APHC010166272021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
WRIT PETITION NO: 13428/2021
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. B RAVI KUMAR, B. RAMA SWAMY, AGED 52 YRS., OCCUPATION BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO. 1-1-4-7AND9, VR STREET, BELLARY ROAD, RAYADURGA VII AND MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
2. SMT. B. REBKA,, W/O. B. RAVI KUMAR, AGED 49 YRS., OCCUPATION. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. D.NO. 1-1-4-7AND9, VR STREET, BELLARY ROAD, RAYADURGA VIL AND MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY IT PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI.
2. THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, ANANTHAPURAM BRANCH, D. NO. 28/453-E2, NEAR COLLECTORATE, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): CORAM:- HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE LISA GILL
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Present:- None appears on behalf of petitioners.
Mr. G.R. Sudhakar, Advocate for respondent No.2. ******
LISA GILL,J.
1. Petitioners in this writ petition have challenged proceedings undertaken by respondents under SARFAESI Act, 2002, on account of financial indiscipline on their part.
2. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that matter has been settled with petitioner and loan account of borrower/petitioner was closed under OTS on 16.03.2026. Entire OTS amount has been deposited by borrower. Therefore, present writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
3. None appears on behalf of petitioners. However, in view of the specific stand of respondents, we do not find any justification for continuation of present proceedings. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of as infructuous and proceedings are closed. Liberty is afforded to petitioner to file appropriate application within four (04) weeks, in case of any incorrect fact being placed before us. No order as to costs.
4. Pending applications, if any, are disposed of accordingly.
(LISA GILL) JUDGE
(NINALA JAYASURYA) JUDGE
Date: 02.04.2026 ANS
HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE LISA GILL HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION NO: 13428/2021
Date: 02.04.2026 ANS