Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRLP/2536/2026 of SAKE MASOOD Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 1 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2536/2026 Between: 1.SAKE MASOOD, S/O SAKE SALAPPA, AGED 30 YEARS OCC

APHC010171522026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

Between:

1.SAKE MASOOD, S/O SAKE SALAPPA,

AGED 30 YEARS OCC

AGRICULTURIST,

D.NO. 7-109, AMBEDKAR STREET,

PAMIDI

TOWN AND MANDAL, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED

AND

1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Through Station House Officer, Pamidi P.S, Anantapuramu District, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P, Amaravati.

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS

praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtmay be pleased to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner/accused herein on the event of their arrest in Crime No.

141/2025 of Pamidi P.S. Anantapuramu District Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:

1.K SREEDHAR MURTHY

Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:

1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri K.Sreedhar Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Criminal Petition with liberty to file a fresh application at an appropriate time.

2. Permission is accorded.

3. Mrs. K. Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, appears on behalf of the State and is in attendance.

4. In view of the above, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh application at an appropriate time. Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 02.04.2026 SAB

Dt.02.04.2026 SAB

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead