Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/9953/2019 of Pulivarthi Venkata Ramanamma, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh, on 1 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 9953/2019 Between: 1. PULIVARTHI VENKATA RAMANAMMA,, W/O. TIMMA NAIDU, AGED 48 YEARS,

APHC010224342019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 9953/2019

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. PULIVARTHI VENKATA RAMANAMMA,, W/O. TIMMA NAIDU, AGED 48 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/ O. D.NO. 7-63, SHANTHI NAGAR, MUTYALAREDDYPALLE VILLAGE, TIRUPATHI-2, TIRUPATHI URBAN MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT

...PETITIONER AND

1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

REVENUE (STAMPS AND REGISTRATION) DEPARTMENT,

SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT AT CHITTOOR.

3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

4. THE TAHSILDAR, TITUPATHI URBAN MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

5. THE SUB REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE SUB REGISTRAR, TIRUPATHI URBAN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be

JS,J W.P.No.9953/2019

pleased toto issue a Writ, One in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Wirt, Direction or Order declaring the action of the 5th respondent in insisting the petitioner to get No Objection Certificate from the respondents 2 to 4 in respect of R.C.C. building vide D.No. 7-62 in Sy.No. 296 to an extent of 4189.5 Square feet situated at Panchayat ward 7, Mutyalareddypalle Village, Tirupathi, Tirupathi Urban Mandal, Chittoor District and not informing the stamp duty and registration charges payable to register the said land in favour of Vendee of the petitioner, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice, and consequently direct the 5th respondent to receive, admit the sale deeds in respect of above said land for registration and release the same, in the interest of justice, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 5th Respondent to receive, admit the sale deeds in respect of R.C.C. Biding vide D.No. 7-62 in Sy.No. 296 to an extent of 4189.5 Squareet situated at Panchayat ward 7, Mutyalareddypalle Village, Tirupathi, Tirupathi Urban Mandal, Chittoor District without insisting for No Objection Certificate and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. RAMBABU KOPPINEEDI Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP)

JS,J W.P.No.9953/2019

The Court made the following ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents.

2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the petitioner has not provided sufficient proof that the representation was duly addressed to the respondents. Conversely, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he will make an application before the Grama Sachivalayam.

3. In view of the submissions made by both the learned counsels, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the matter by directing the petitioner to make an application within a period of three (3) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order and thereafter respondents to consider and pass orders on the representation made by the petitioner, after giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and any other interested parties. Such final orders shall be passed on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight (8) weeks. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________

JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 02.04.2026

RSD

JS,J

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 9953/2019

Dated: 02.04.2026

RSD

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead