Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/9953/2019 of Pulivarthi Venkata Ramanamma, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh, on 1 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 9953/2019 Between: 1. PULIVARTHI VENKATA RAMANAMMA,, W/O. TIMMA NAIDU, AGED 48 YEARS,
APHC010224342019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 9953/2019
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. PULIVARTHI VENKATA RAMANAMMA,, W/O. TIMMA NAIDU, AGED 48 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/ O. D.NO. 7-63, SHANTHI NAGAR, MUTYALAREDDYPALLE VILLAGE, TIRUPATHI-2, TIRUPATHI URBAN MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
REVENUE (STAMPS AND REGISTRATION) DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT AT CHITTOOR.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
4. THE TAHSILDAR, TITUPATHI URBAN MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
5. THE SUB REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE SUB REGISTRAR, TIRUPATHI URBAN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
JS,J W.P.No.9953/2019
pleased toto issue a Writ, One in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Wirt, Direction or Order declaring the action of the 5th respondent in insisting the petitioner to get No Objection Certificate from the respondents 2 to 4 in respect of R.C.C. building vide D.No. 7-62 in Sy.No. 296 to an extent of 4189.5 Square feet situated at Panchayat ward 7, Mutyalareddypalle Village, Tirupathi, Tirupathi Urban Mandal, Chittoor District and not informing the stamp duty and registration charges payable to register the said land in favour of Vendee of the petitioner, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice, and consequently direct the 5th respondent to receive, admit the sale deeds in respect of above said land for registration and release the same, in the interest of justice, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 5th Respondent to receive, admit the sale deeds in respect of R.C.C. Biding vide D.No. 7-62 in Sy.No. 296 to an extent of 4189.5 Squareet situated at Panchayat ward 7, Mutyalareddypalle Village, Tirupathi, Tirupathi Urban Mandal, Chittoor District without insisting for No Objection Certificate and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RAMBABU KOPPINEEDI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP)
JS,J W.P.No.9953/2019
The Court made the following ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents.
2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the petitioner has not provided sufficient proof that the representation was duly addressed to the respondents. Conversely, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he will make an application before the Grama Sachivalayam.
3. In view of the submissions made by both the learned counsels, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the matter by directing the petitioner to make an application within a period of three (3) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order and thereafter respondents to consider and pass orders on the representation made by the petitioner, after giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and any other interested parties. Such final orders shall be passed on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight (8) weeks. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________
JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 02.04.2026
RSD
JS,J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 9953/2019
Dated: 02.04.2026
RSD