Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/4470/2024 of KATRAGUNTA VENKATAPPA NAIDU Vs State of Andhra Pradesh on 1 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 4470/2024 Between: 1. KATRAGUNTA VENKATAPPA NAIDU, S/O. RAMULU, AGED 47 YEARS, OCC

APHC010081412024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

WRIT PETITION NO: 4470/2024

Between:

1. KATRAGUNTA VENKATAPPA NAIDU, S/O. RAMULU, AGED 47

YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O. MUTTAMVARIPALEM

VILLAGE, LINGASAMUDRAM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE

DISTRICT. (ERSTWHILE PRAKASAM DISTRICT)

...PETITIONER

AND

1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, WATER RESOURCES

DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, MINOR AND MEDIUM IRRIGATION, VIJAYAWADA- N.T.R DISTRICT.

3. SUPERINTENDING

ENGINEER,

IRRIGATION

CIRCLE

AT

ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

4. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DIVISION, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

5. PAY

AND

ACCOUNTS

OFFICER,

WORKS

AND

PROJECTS,,ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

6. DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION SUB-DIVISION, KANDUKUR, SPSR

NELLORE

DISTRICT.

(ERSTWHILE

PRAKASAM DISTRICT).

7. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE AND PLANNING

DEPARTMENT. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI. AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents in non-payment of amounts due to a sum of Rs.

1,07,69,079/- even after finalizing the bills, payable to petitioner after the successful completion of the execution of works pursuant to M-Book numbers 1472, 1652, 1332 and 1474 under PMKSY-HKKP-RRR of WBs Scheme grant to cost for the material supplied by him for Repair Renovation and Restoration of tanks in Lingasamudram and V.V Palem Mandal in SPSR Nellore District (Erstwhile Prakasam District), issued by 3rd and 4th respondents., as illegal, irregular, irrational, amounts to non-discharge of legal obligation conferred on them and under Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to pay the amount of Rs. 1,07,69,079/- along with interest 18 percent per annum for the delayed amount to the petitioner for the said works executed by the petitioner and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to pay the amount of Rs.

1,07,69,079/- to the petitioner forthwith in respect of the work executed by the petitioner pursuant to the M-Book numbers 1472, 1652, 1332 and 1474 under PMKSY-HKKP-RRR of WBs Scheme grant to cost for the material supplied by petitioner for Repair Renovation and Restoration of tanks in Lingasamudram and V.V Palem Mandal in SPSR Nellore District (Erstwhile Prakasam District) issued by 3rd and 4th respondents., pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING

2. GP FOR IRRI AND CAD (AP)

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Aggrieved by non-payment of bill amount to the petitioner for the work executed under various Agreements, the present writ petition is filed.

2. Heard Sri Pala Karthi Kiran, learned counsel representing Ms.Nimmagadda Revathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Satish Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Irrigation for the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the authorities have paid the entitled amounts to the petitioner and there remains nothing for adjudication, accordingly, prayed to close the writ petition.

4. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________

JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 02nd April, 2026 RKS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead