Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/1036/2026 of Narvaneni Murali Vs Y.V.V. Naidu on 31 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1036/2026 Between: NARVANENI MURALI, S/O HANUMANTHA RAO AGED ABOUT 54YRS,
APHC010124122026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1036/2026
Between:
NARVANENI MURALI, S/O HANUMANTHA RAO AGED ABOUT 54YRS, OCC BUSINESS R/O H.N0.6-6/B, RYTHUPETA NANDIGAMA, NTR
DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
Y V V NAIDU, STATION HOUSE OFFICER NANDIGAMA POLICE
STATION NANDIGAMA, NTR DISTRICT
...CONTEMNOR
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P NAGENDRA REDDY
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. G.P FOR HOME
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 is filed the Petitioner praying to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the order of this Hon'ble Court passed in W.P.No.30317 of 2025 dated 06.11.2025.
2. Heard Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Ms.A.Jayanthi, learned Government Pleader for Home.
3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Respondent / Police had not complied with the direction given by this Court in the order dated 06.11.2025 in W.P.No.30317 of 2025.
4. Ms.A.Jayanthi, learned Government Pleader for Home would submit that there is no direction given to the Police by this Court in the order dated 06.11.2025 in W.P.No.30317 of 2025, as such, willful disobedience does not arise. Hence, prayed to close the petition.
5. As seen from the said order, as rightly put by the learned Government Pleader for Home, there is no direction to the Respondent / Police in the said order. In that view, willful disobedience of the said order or contempt of court does not arise.
6. In that view, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:01.04.2026 Dinesh
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
C.C.No.1036 of 2026
Dt.01.04.2026
Dinesh