Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/271/2026 of Silarapu Ravi Prasad Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 31 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 271/2026 Between: SILARAPU RAVI PRASAD, S/O. SILARAPU VENKATESWARA
APHC010118122026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 271/2026
Between:
SILARAPU
RAVI
PRASAD,
S/O.
SILARAPU
VENKATESWARA
RAO,AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS. GOVT.JOB,JUNIOR ASSISTANT IN
Z.P. HIGH SCHOOL,VEERAPANENIGUDEM VILLAGE,GANNAVARAM
MANDAL,ELURU DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC
PROSECUTORHIGH COURT OF A.P., AT AMARAVATI.
2. SILARAPU ALIAS ADDEPALLI NIRMALA JYOTHI, W/O.SILARAPU
RAVI PRASAD,D/O. RAJENDRA RAO, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,R/O.
DOOR
NO.
4-17-4,
GANDHI
BOMMA
CENTRE,LAMBADIPET,
VIJAYAWADA -1.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PATTIPATI KALYAN KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The instant Criminal Revision Case under Sections 438 & 442 of BNSS has been filed by the Petitioner seeking to set aside the Order dated 09.01.2026 passed in F.C.O.P.No.1315 of 2023 by the learned Additional Family Judge-cum-XIV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada.
2. Petitioner was directed to pay Rs.10,000/- to Respondent No.2 towards costs tentatively to enable her to appear before this Court to defend the case. Inspite of the said direction, the Petitioner has not appeared before this Court. As such, this Court would like to dispose of the revision on merits.
3. This is a revision case filed against the order of maintenance passed in F.C.O.P.No.1315 of 2023 on the file of the Court of Additional Family Judge, Vijayawada. The trial Court vide order dated 09.01.2026 granted maintenance of Rs.17,000/- per month to Respondent No.2 / Wife.
4. The record would show that there is no dispute about the relationship between the parties. The impugned order would show that the Petitioner herein, who is the husband, is working as Junior Assistant in Zilla Parishad High School and earning Rs.42,000/- per month. Taking into consideration of the dependency of Respondent No.2 / Wife, income of the Petitioner and his obligation to maintain the wife, the learned trial Judge has rightly granted monthly maintenance of Rs.17,000/- to the wife to enable her to live on par with the status of the husband. In such circumstances, this Court does not find any warranting circumstances to interfere in the said order.
5. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:01.04.2026 Dinesh
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Crl.R.C.No.271 of 2026
Dt.01.04.2026
Dinesh