Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/17223/2023 of ANDHRA PRADESH RASTRA GIRIJANA RATION DEALER SANKSHEMA SANGHAM Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 31 March 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 17223/2023 Between: 1. ANDHRA PRADESH RASTRA GIRIJANA RATION DEALER
APHC010335722023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO: 17223/2023
Between:
1. ANDHRA PRADESH RASTRA GIRIJANA RATION DEALER
SANKSHEMA SANGHAM, (REGD.NO.435/2020), SITUATED
AT 1-O,ARAKU VALLEY MANDAL, ALLURI SITARAMA
RAJU DISTRICT, REP., BY ITS PRESIDENT A.VYKUNTAM
S/O BUDDU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O D. NO 1-00
MADAGUDA, POST AND SUB DIVISION ARAKU VALLY, ALLURI SITARAMA RAJU DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY
ITS
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
TRIBAL
WELFARE
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS,
AT
AMARAVATI.
2. THE DIRECTOR OF TRIBAL WELFARE DEPARPTMENT, COMMISISIONERATE, VIJAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, (C.S) PARVATHI PURAM
MANYAM DISTRICT , ANDHRA PRADESH.
4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALLURI SITHARAMARAJU
DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
5. THE
SUB
COLLECTOR,
ITDA,
PADERU,
ALLURI
SITHARAMARAJU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
6. THE
SUB
COLLECTOR,
ITDA,
PARVATHIPURAM,
MANYAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
7. THE PROJECT OFFICER, , ITDA, (INTEGRATAED TRIBAL
DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY)
PADERU,
ALLURISITHARAMARAJU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
8. THE PROJECT OFFICER, ITDA, (INTEGRATAED TRIBAL
DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY)
RAMPACHODAVARAM,
ALLURI SITHARAMARAJU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
9. THE PROJECT OFFICER, ITDA, (INTEGRATAED TRIBAL
DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY)
PARVATHI
PURAM,
MANYAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
10. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, GIRAJANA CO-OPERATIVE
CORPORATION,
ANDHRA
PRADESH,
AT
VISAKHAPATNAM.
11. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
12. THE
PROJECT
OFFICER,
(INTEGRATED
TRIBAL
DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY)ITDA
SEETHAMPETA
SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the representations of the petitioner Association
dated 03-02-2023 and 07-03-2023, as illegal and unconstitutional and in violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India, and further direct the respondents to consider the request of the petitioner association for regular employment and convert the Ration Shop Dealers of the petitioner association as Girijana Cooperative Corporation(GCC) Employees in place where they are working right now and implement minimum time scales for their service to the society as Girijana Cooperative Corporations Employees, and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the representations of the petitioner Association dated 03-02-2023 and 07-03-2023, pending disposal of the above writ petition, and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. ANUMULA VAMSI KRISHNA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. P V V SATYANARAYANA (SC FOR GIRIJAN C O)
2.
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
In view of the letter dated 23.03.2026 addressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner to the Registry seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition, permission is accorded.
2. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as cots. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
Date:01.04.2026 GK
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO:17223 of 2023
Dated:01.04.2026
GK