Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/17223/2023 of ANDHRA PRADESH RASTRA GIRIJANA RATION DEALER SANKSHEMA SANGHAM Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 31 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 17223/2023 Between: 1. ANDHRA PRADESH RASTRA GIRIJANA RATION DEALER

APHC010335722023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

WRIT PETITION NO: 17223/2023

Between:

1. ANDHRA PRADESH RASTRA GIRIJANA RATION DEALER

SANKSHEMA SANGHAM, (REGD.NO.435/2020), SITUATED

AT 1-O,ARAKU VALLEY MANDAL, ALLURI SITARAMA

RAJU DISTRICT, REP., BY ITS PRESIDENT A.VYKUNTAM

S/O BUDDU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O D. NO 1-00

MADAGUDA, POST AND SUB DIVISION ARAKU VALLY, ALLURI SITARAMA RAJU DISTRICT

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY

ITS

PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY,

TRIBAL

WELFARE

DEPARTMENT,

SECRETARIAT

BUILDINGS,

AT

AMARAVATI.

2. THE DIRECTOR OF TRIBAL WELFARE DEPARPTMENT, COMMISISIONERATE, VIJAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, (C.S) PARVATHI PURAM

MANYAM DISTRICT , ANDHRA PRADESH.

4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALLURI SITHARAMARAJU

DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

5. THE

SUB

COLLECTOR,

ITDA,

PADERU,

ALLURI

SITHARAMARAJU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

6. THE

SUB

COLLECTOR,

ITDA,

PARVATHIPURAM,

MANYAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

7. THE PROJECT OFFICER, , ITDA, (INTEGRATAED TRIBAL

DEVELOPMENT

AUTHORITY)

PADERU,

ALLURISITHARAMARAJU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

8. THE PROJECT OFFICER, ITDA, (INTEGRATAED TRIBAL

DEVELOPMENT

AUTHORITY)

RAMPACHODAVARAM,

ALLURI SITHARAMARAJU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

9. THE PROJECT OFFICER, ITDA, (INTEGRATAED TRIBAL

DEVELOPMENT

AUTHORITY)

PARVATHI

PURAM,

MANYAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

10. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, GIRAJANA CO-OPERATIVE

CORPORATION,

ANDHRA

PRADESH,

AT

VISAKHAPATNAM.

11. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

12. THE

PROJECT

OFFICER,

(INTEGRATED

TRIBAL

DEVELOPMENT

AUTHORITY)ITDA

SEETHAMPETA

SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the representations of the petitioner Association

dated 03-02-2023 and 07-03-2023, as illegal and unconstitutional and in violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India, and further direct the respondents to consider the request of the petitioner association for regular employment and convert the Ration Shop Dealers of the petitioner association as Girijana Cooperative Corporation(GCC) Employees in place where they are working right now and implement minimum time scales for their service to the society as Girijana Cooperative Corporations Employees, and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the representations of the petitioner Association dated 03-02-2023 and 07-03-2023, pending disposal of the above writ petition, and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. ANUMULA VAMSI KRISHNA

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. P V V SATYANARAYANA (SC FOR GIRIJAN C O)

2.

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

In view of the letter dated 23.03.2026 addressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner to the Registry seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition, permission is accorded.

2. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as cots. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH

Date:01.04.2026 GK

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH

WRIT PETITION NO:17223 of 2023

Dated:01.04.2026

GK

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead