Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/734/2019 of DUVVADA ESWARA RAO @ DILLESWARA RAO Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 31 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 734/2019 Between: DUVVADA ESWARA RAO @ DILLESWARA RAO, R/O.
APHC010195862019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 734/2019
Between:
DUVVADA
ESWARA
RAO
@
DILLESWARA
RAO,
R/O.
ROTARYNAGAR
KASIBUGGA
TOWN
PALASA
KASIBUGGA
MUNICIPALITY, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR,
HIGH
COURT
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT
AMARAVATHI.
2. SMT DUVVADA SWAPNA, W/O. DILLESWARARAO, R/O. D.NO.NILL, ANNAPURNA ASHRAMAM STREET, PALASA, PALASA KASIBUGGA
MUNICIPALITY, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
3. DUVVADA TAISHVI, S/O. DILLESWARARAO
4. DUVVADA DVIKSHIT, D/O. DILLESWARARAO, (SINCE THE 2ND
AND 3RD RESPONDENTS ARE BEING MINORS REPRESENTED BY
THE 2ND RESPONDENT WHO IS THEIR MOTHER AND NATURAL
GUARDIAN
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PILLIX LAW FIRM
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The instant Criminal Revision Case under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C has been filed by the Petitioner / husband seeking to set aside the
Order dated 17.05.2019 passed in M.C.No.17 of 2014 on the file of the Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Palasa.
2. Heard Sri P.Kasi Nageswara Rao, learned counsel for the Petitioner / Husband.
3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner / Husband would submit that the impugned order is unsustainable in law. Respondent No.2 / wife had left the matrimonial home without informing the Petitioner. It is further submitted that, it is clear from Exs.R.1 to R.11 that the Petitioner has been maintaining his wife and children. Learned counsel would further submit that, except stating that the Petitioner has been working as a Software Engineer and earning Rs.1,00,000/- per month, no proof has been filed by the Respondent / Wife to prove the income of the Petitioner.
4. Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor is in attendance.
5. Considering the submissions made and on perusal of the record, this Court finds that, the learned trial Judge, taking into consideration the income and obligation of the Petitioner / Husband to maintain his wife and children and the inability of Respondents / Wife and children to maintain themselves and their necessities and on appreciation of the material placed on record, has rightly granted maintenance of Rs.10,000/- per month to each of the Respondent. This Court does not find any illegality, perversity, or material irregularity in the order warranting interference in revision.
6. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed confirming the Order dated 17.05.2019 passed in M.C.No.17 of 2014 on the file of the Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Palasa.
Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:01.04.2026 Dinesh
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Crl.R.C.No.734 OF 2019
Dt. 01.04.2026
Dinesh