Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/1905/2025 of DATLA SRINIVASA RAJU Vs DATLA SITARAMA RAJU on 31 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1905/2025 Between: 1. DATLA SRINIVASA RAJU, S/O D.V.P. RAJU AGED ABOUT 56
APHC010225382025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1905/2025
Between:
1. DATLA SRINIVASA RAJU, S/O D.V.P. RAJU AGED ABOUT 56
YEARS,
BUSINEES,
R/O.
FLAT
NO.
104,
RAJITHA
APARTMENT, RAJIV NAGAR, HYDERABAD.
2. UADDARAJU VENKATA SATYA SURYA SUBRAHMANYAM
RAJU,, S/O SATYANARAYANA RAJU, AGED 55 YEARS.
BUSINESS, R/O. NARASIMHAPURAM VILLAGE, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. DATLA SITARAMA RAJU, S/O. VENKATA RAJU, AGED ABOUT
56 YEARS, R/O. CHERUKUMILLI VILLAGE, AKIVEEDU
MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
2. M RAMAKRISHNA, S/O. ATCHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O. PHB COLONY, HIG-15, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI
DISTRICT.
3. M/S GAYATRI MARINE PRODUCTS PVT LTD, REP. BY ITS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, D.K. ANNAPURNA, W/O. D. SIVARAMA
RAJU, AGED ABOUT OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. PLOT NO.1242/B, ROAD NO.62, JUBLIEE HILLS, HYDERABAD.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Machilipatnam, Krishna District to dispose Interlocutory Application in
I.A.No. 141 of 2024 in I.A.No.8 of 2018 in I.A.No.7 of 2017 in O.S.No. 2
OF 2017 preferably within three months and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Aggrieved by the non disposal of I.A.No.141 of 2024 in I.A.No.8 of 2018 in I.A.No.7 of 2017 in O.S.No.2 of 2017 pending on the file of the Court of the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Machilipatnam, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed.
2. Heard Sri Narasimha Rao Gudiseva, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri M.Radha Krishna, learned counsel for the respondents.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that I.A.No.141 of 2024 in I.A.No.8 of 2018 in I.A.No.7 of 2017 in O.S.No.2 of 2017 has been filed on the file of the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Machilipatnam, duly praying the Court to restore I.A.No.7 of 2018 by setting aside the dismissal order dated 08.09.2023 by permitting them to continue the proceedings. He further contended that the present Civil Revision Petition can be disposed of with a direction to the trial Court to dispose of the I.A.No.141 of 2024 in a time bound manner.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that he has instructions in that regard and reported no objection for giving such direction.
5. Taking their submissions into consideration, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. The trial Court is directed to dispose of the I.A.No.141 of 2024 in I.A.No.8 of 2018 in I.A.No.7 of 2017 in O.S.No.2 of 2017 as expeditiously as possible within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Date: 01st April, 2026
RKS