WP/7068/2019 of C.Yuvaraj Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 31 March 2026

1. C.YUVARAJ, S/O LATE PERUMAL, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC- AGRICUTURE, R/O 3-62/1, RENIGUNTA ROAD, TIRUPATI, CHITOOR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI,GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT CHITTOOR.

3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

4. THE TAHSILDAR, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL,

TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ , Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No. 2 to 4 in interfearing with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners property land admeasuring 33 cents along with the tin shed bearing No.3-90/1, situated in Sy.No.302/4 at Tirchanur Revenue village of Tirupati

JS,J W.P.No.7068/2019

Rural Mandal, Chittoor District is illegal, arbbitrary and against the principles of nautral justice and consequently direct the 4th Respondent to permit the petitioner in enquiry proceedings vide ROC A/418 of 2018 IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents 2 to 4 not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the the land admeasuring 33 cents along with the tin shed bearing No.3-90/1, situated in Sy.No.302/4 at Tirchanur Revenue village of Tirupati Rural Mandal, Chittoor District, pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. CH VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

JS,J W.P.No.7068/2019

The Court made the following ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents.

2. Sri.T.Harsha Sai Pavan, learned counsel, representing, Sri CH Venkat Raman, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the 4th respondent without conducting proper enquiry, issued notice dated 10.11.2018, directing the petitioner to appear before the Tahsildar, Tirupati Rural Mandal, on 26.11.2018.

3. On the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the petitioner without submitting the explanation to the notice dated 10.11.2018, approached this Court.

4. In view of the above, without going into the merits of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the petitioner to submit explanation to the notice dated 10.11.2018, within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of such explanation, the respondents shall consider and pass appropriate order in accordance with law, by giving an opportunity of hearing to all affected parties, within a period of four (04) weeks thereafter. Till such time, the respondents shall not dispossess the petitioner from the subject land i.e., land admeasuring 33 cents along with the tin shed bearing No.3-90/1, situated in Sy.No.302/4 at Tirchanur Revenue village of Tirupati Rural Mandal, Chittoor District. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________

JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 01.04.2026

RSD

JS,J

JS,J

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 7068/2019

Dated: 01.04.2026

RSD