Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/1242/2008 of PRATHIPATI BULLAMMA Vs PRATHIPATHI RAMA KRISHNA on 31 March 2026
& BM,J CMA. NO.1242 OF 2008) APHC010592982008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3572] WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
APHC010592982008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1242/2008
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. PRATHIPATI BULLAMMA, W/O RAMA KRISHNA YARAMATIVARI VEEDHI, VELANGI , KARAPA MANDAL,
...APPELLANT AND
1. PRATHIPATHI RAMA KRISHNA, S/o Bhaskara Rao Cultivation Dangeru, Pamarru Mandal, E.G.Dist,.
...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2008(CMAMP 2292 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the Order and Decree dated 28-3-2008 made in HMOP.NO. 101 of 2005 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada, pending disposal of the above appeal IA NO: 4 OF 2008(CMAMP 43472 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant:
1. C V R RUDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent:
1. VENKAT CHALLA The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:-(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)
This appeal has been filed by the appellant/wife, being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 28.03.2008 passed in H.M.O.P. No.101 of 2005 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada, whereby the petition filed by the respondent/husband under Section 12(1)(c) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was allowed granting a decree of divorce.
2. On 2.03.2026 the following order was passed:
“The present appeal has been filed by the appellant/wife, challenging the decree of divorce granted on the petition instituted by the respondent/husband.
2. On 18.10.2008, a Co-ordinate Bench granted interim suspension of the divorce decree.
3. On 03.02.2026, the matter was adjourned at the request made on behalf of the appellant’s counsel, and on 18.02.2026, time was granted to obtain instructions.
4. Today also, learned counsel for the appellant seeks an adjournment.
5. Considering the nature of the appeal and the subsisting interim order, one final opportunity is granted to the appellant to obtain instructions.
6. As last opportunity, list after three (03) weeks.
7. List on 23.03.2026.”
3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the respondent/husband has died and that he has received oral instructions from the brother of the appellant/wife that she is not inclined to pursue further prosecution.
He submits that, despite a registered letter, no response has been received from the appellant to proceed further.
4. Recording the aforesaid submission, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is closed.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed.
____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J
___________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI,J Date :01.04.2026. RPD.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
(CLOSED)
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1242 OF 2008
Date: 01.04.2026
RPD.