Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/114/2015 of T. Madan Mohan Reddy, Vs Principal Secretary to Government of Andhra Pradesh, on 31 March 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3558] WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 114/2015
APHC010157192015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 114/2015
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. T. MADAN MOHAN REDDY,, S/O. LATE T. CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY, AGE: 67 YEARS, OCC: EX- JUDICIAL MEMBER OF A.P. ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, HYDERABAD, R/O. PLOT NO. 73, PRAKASHNAGAR COLONY APSEB SOCIETY, HYDERGUDA, RAJENDRA NAGAR MANDAL, RANGA REDDY DISTRICT-500 048
2. T. PRADYUMNA KUMAR REDDY,, S/O. LATE T. CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY, AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC: PRACTICING ADVOCATE AT HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD, R/O. PLOT NO.373-A, ROAD NO.22, JUBILEE HILLS, HYDERABAD-33.
3. SMT. E. VIJAYA LAKSHMI,, W/O. E.V.S. REDDY AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, R/O.203, PALM SPRINGS, SHANTINAGAR, HYDERABAD.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD.
2. CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION, ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD.
3. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTAPURAMU.
4. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ANANTAPURAMU, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT.
5. TAHSILDAR, ANANTAPURAMU, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents under the Contempt of Courts Act for wilful and deliberate disobedience of the orders of this Hon'ble High Court passed in W.P.No. 33217 of 2011, dated 25.09.2012 and in C.C. 965 of 2013 dated 12.11.2014 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. N V RAGHAVA REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL (AP)
The Court made the following: ORDER:- (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)
When the matter has taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, submits that the order of the Court has been complied with by the respondents.
2. Therefore, recording the above submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
_____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
Date: 01.04.2026 ARR
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 114/2015 Date: 01.04.2026
ARR