Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/3348/2025 of Sri Govindaraju Vari Dharma Inam Trust, Vs Sri Vadarevu Vinay Chand, IAS, on 31 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3348/2025 Between: 1. SRI GOVINDARAJU VARI DHARMA INAM TRUST,, REP., BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE, SRI G. PRAVEEN KUMAR, S/O G. SRINIVAS RAO, AGED

APHC010596202025

IN TH

WEDNE

TWO

THE HONOURA

CO

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. SRI GOVINDARAJ MANAGING TRUST RAO, AGED ABO RESIDENCY, VIJA PUBLIC SCHOOL, V

1. SRI VADAREVU VI KNOWN TO TH ENDOWMENTS DE AMARAVATI, GUNT

2. SRI K RAMACHAN KNOWN TO THE DEPARTMENT, GO Petition under Secti that in the circumstances be pleased to call the co to 12 of the Contempt o violating the order passe 26.09.2024 and to pass Counsel for the Petition

1. VENKAT SAILENDR Counsel for the Contem

1. NAGARAJU NAGUR

E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) ESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL NTEMPT CASE NO: 3348/2025 U VARI DHARMA INAM TRUST,, TEE, SRI G. PRAVEEN KUMAR, S/O OUT 48 YEARS, R/O D.NO.F AY NAGAR COLONY, BESIDE VIJAYAWADA-10. AND NAY CHAND IAS, FATHERS NAME A HE PETITIONER.

PRINCIPAL EPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, TUR DISTRICT. NDRA MOHAN, FATHERS NAME A PETITIONER. COMMISSIONER, E OLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA. ...CO ons 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts A s stated in the affidavit file herein the ontemnors herein and punish them un of Courts Act for willful disobedience ed by this Hon’ble Court in WP No. 992 ner: RA G mnor(S): RU DESH

LAPATI REP., BY ITS O G. SRINIVAS FF-1, SUJANA DON BOSCO ...PETITIONER AND AGE NOT SECRETARY, VELAGAPUDI, AND AGE NOT ENDOWMENTS ONTEMNOR(S): Act 1971 praying High Court may nder Sections 10 and deliberately 2 of 2022, dated

The Court made the following order:

This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 26.09.2024 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.992 of 2022.

2. Sri G.Venkat Sailendra, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the respondent authorities have complied with the order dated 26.09.2024 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.992 of 2022, however with some delay.

3. To the said submission, Sri Nagaraju Naguru, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that due to administrative reasons, the said delay occurred and the same is neither willful nor wanton, as such, prayed to close the Contempt Case.

4. In view of the above, since the respondents have complied with the orders of this Court and also explained the delay satisfactorily, this Court is inclined to close the Contempt Case. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any in the Contempt Case, shall stand closed.

___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 01.04.2026 MP

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

CONTEMPT CASE NO:3348 of 2025 Date: 01.04.2026

MP

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead