WP/9473/2019 of K Munirathnam Naidu Vs THE STATE OF AP on 30 March 2026

1. K MUNIRATHNAM NAIDU, S/O. KRISHNAMA NAIDU, HINDU, AGED 72 YRS, OCC. CULTIVATION R/O. D NO. 2-54, M M KANDRIGA VILLAGE, PANKAM POST, TIRUPATHI RURAL MANDAL, CHITTOOR DIST.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BTCLGS, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DIST.

3. THE SUB COLLECTOR / REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DIST.

4. THE THASILDAR, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL, CHITTOOR DIST

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents 2 to 4 in taking action on the representation/ objections filed by the petitioners dt. 11.2.2019 in proposing to issue house sites in Sy No. 133/1 and 138 situated at Panakam Village, Tirupathi Rural Mandal, Chittoor District which is a

JS,J W.P.No.9473/2019

KaluvaPorambokuis illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and violative of Article 19, 21 and 300A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to take action on the petitioners representation / objections dt. 11.2.2019 in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 to dispose of the petitioners representation / objections dt. 11.2.2019 pending disposal of WP in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. T JANARDHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

JS,J W.P.No.9473/2019

The Court made the following ORDER:

When the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner.

2. Learned AGP submits that the writ petition has been filed with a prayer to direct the authorities to dispose of the representations dated 11th February 2019, regarding proposals to issue house sites in survey numbers 133/1 and 138, located at Panakam Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Chittoor District.

3. The Learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the counter- affidavit filed by the 4th respondent explicitly states that there is no proposal to issue house-site pattas for Sy.No. 133/1 and 138 of Panakam Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, because the subject lands are Kalva Poramboke. He has requested that this statement be recorded and that the writ petition be closed.

4. In view of the submissions in counter-affidavit filed by the respondent that the subject land is classified as kalavaporamboku and that there are no proposals for the insurance of house site pattas in survey number x x, this court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, grants liberty to the petitioner to submit a fresh representation regarding their grievance. Upon receipt of such representation, the respondents are directed to consider and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. With the above observation, repetition is disposed of.

As a sequel, any miscellaneous applications pending shall stand closed.

__________________________________

JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 31.03.2026

RSD

JS,J

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 9473/2019

JS,J W.P.No.9473/2019

Dated: 31.03.2026

RSD