WP/12448/2019 of R SUBRAHMANYAM Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 30 March 2026

1. R SUBRAHMANYAM, R. SUBRAMANYAM S/O. R.RAMARAJU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT

YEARS, OCC PRIVATE JOB, R/O.SIDHIRAJUKANDRIGA VILLAGE, PICHATURMANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, THULLURMANDAL, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE COMMISSIONER OF LAND REVENUE/LAND ADMINISTRATION, GOLLAPUDI PHASE-I, VIJAYAWADA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

3. THE SUB COLLECTOR, TIRUPATHI, AIR BY-PASS ROAD, MUTYALA REDDY PALLY, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, PIN CODE 517502.

4. THE TAHSILDARMRO, TIRUPATHI URBAN MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, PINCODE 517502

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ or order, Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly R4 in not issuing prior notice of demolishing my Tin Shed in which I am living i.e., in

JS, J W.P.No.12448/2019

plot no.23 in Sy.No.173/3 to an extent of 4 cents in T.H.S No. 570/1992 dt 25- 5-1992 situated in KonkachennayaGuntaVillage, TirupathiMandal, Chittoor District is illegal, highhanded, in-violation of Art.14 and 21 of the Constitution of India besides being opposed the Principles of natural Justice and consequently direct the R4 not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of my Tin Shed constructed in Plot No.23 in Sy.No.173/3 to an extent of 4 cents situated in KonkachennayaGuntaVillage, TirupathiMandal, Chittoor District and pass in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents particularly R4 as not to demolish my Tin Shed situated in Plot No.23 in Sy.No.173/3 to an extent of cents in KonkachennayaGuntaVillage, TirupathiMandal, Chittoor District pending the above Writ Petition in the interest of justice.

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To extend the Interim orders in I.A. No. 01/2019 in WP. NO. 12448/2019, dated 13. 10.2020 will further orders in respect of my pucca house situated in Plot No. 23 in SY. NO. 173/3 to an extent of 0.4 cents in Konka Chennayagunta Village,Tirupathi Mandal, Chittoor District, pending disposal of the Writ petition in the interest of justice.

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to vacate the interim orders passed in IA 1/2019 in WP. 12448/2019 dt 29-08-2019 and dismiss the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. K N VIJAYA LAXMI Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

JS, J W.P.No.12448/2019

The Court made the following ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.

Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 31.03.2026 rsd

JS, J

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 12448/2019

Date: 31.03.2026 rsd