Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/1228/2026 of DHARAVATH KESAVULU Vs SRI S V RAJASEKHARA RAO on 30 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1228/2026 Between: DHARAVATH KESAVULU, S/O SOMALA, AGED ABOUT 70

APHC010150642026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1228/2026

Between:

DHARAVATH KESAVULU, S/O SOMALA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, KANNEVEEDU, VATSAVAI MANDAL, NTR

DISTRICT (A.P).

...PETITIONER

AND

1. SRI S V RAJASEKHARA RAO, COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT.

2. SRI A BALA GANGADHAR TILAK, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF

POLICE, NANDIGAMA, NTR DISTRICT.

3. SRI P UMAMAHESWARA RAO, SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VATSAVAI, NTR DISTRICT.

...CONTEMNOR(S):

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. SUREPALLI MADHAVA RAO

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. G.P FOR HOME

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

This petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 is filed the Petitioner praying to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order of this Hon'ble Court passed in W.P.No.27997 of 2025 dated 16.10.2025.

2. Heard Sri S.Madhava Rao, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Ms.A.Jayanthi, learned Government Pleader for Home.

3. Ms.A.Jayanthi, learned Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the order dated 16.10.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.27997 of 2025 has been complied with concluding the investigation within the time prescribed in the said order. Hence, the contempt proceedings may be closed.

4. Sri S.Madhava Rao, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders.

5. Considering the submissions, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:31.03.2026 Dinesh

HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

C.C.No.1228 of 2026

Dt.31.03.2026

Dinesh

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead