Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/911/2025 of M/S VIKRAM DYE-CHEM (P) LTD Vs A. THAMEEM ANSARIYA, IAS on 30 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2025 1 APHC010082662024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 911/2025 Between: 1. M/S VIKRAM

RC,J

APHC010082662024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 911/2025

Between:

1. M/S VIKRAM DYE-CHEM (P) LTD, REPRESENTED BY THE

MANAGING DIRECTOR B RAMAGOPAL REDDY S/O LATE B SESHI

REDDY AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS OCC BUSINESS R/O FLAT NO 405

SILVER SPRINGS APARTMENTS MANGAMUR ROAD ONGOLE

PRAKASAM DIST, A P.

2. M/S. VIPASANA CONSTRUCTIONS P LTD, REPRESENTED BY ITS

M V KRISHNA REDDY (DIED), S/O LATE M PEDDA CHENCHI

REDDY AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS R/O PLOT NO

933 VIVEKANANDA NAGAR COLONY KUKATPALLY HYDERABAD.

(P-2 M.V. KRISHNA REDDY DIED PER LR. P-3 )

3. SMT. MALE PRABHAVATHI,, W/O. LATE M. VENKATA KRISHNA

REDDY, AGED 70 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO.3-5-43/8, PLOT NO.933, VIVEKANANDA NAGAR COLONY, KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. A THAMEEM ANSARIYA IAS, Collector and District Magistrate, Prakasam Dsitrict, at Ongole

...CONTEMNOR

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may

RC,J

be pleased to pleased to summon the respondent herein and punish him under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willfully, disobeyed and flouted the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No.21274/2018 dated 30-11-2022 (amended order dated 22-02-2023 in IA.No.1 of 2023), and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to condone the delay of 369 days in Re-presenting the

CC.SR.No.6895 of 2024 and to pass

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. V R MACHAVARAM

Counsel for the Contemnor:

1. K M KRISHNA REDDY

The Court made the following:

RC,J

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Sri V.R.Machavaram, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the order, disobedience of which is complained of in this Contempt Case, has duly been complied with this Contempt Case can be closed.

2. In view of the above submission, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

____________________________ JUSETICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 31st March, 2026.

RR

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead