Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/911/2025 of M/S VIKRAM DYE-CHEM (P) LTD Vs A. THAMEEM ANSARIYA, IAS on 30 March 2026
of 2025 1 APHC010082662024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 911/2025 Between: 1. M/S VIKRAM
RC,J
APHC010082662024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 911/2025
Between:
1. M/S VIKRAM DYE-CHEM (P) LTD, REPRESENTED BY THE
MANAGING DIRECTOR B RAMAGOPAL REDDY S/O LATE B SESHI
REDDY AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS OCC BUSINESS R/O FLAT NO 405
SILVER SPRINGS APARTMENTS MANGAMUR ROAD ONGOLE
PRAKASAM DIST, A P.
2. M/S. VIPASANA CONSTRUCTIONS P LTD, REPRESENTED BY ITS
M V KRISHNA REDDY (DIED), S/O LATE M PEDDA CHENCHI
REDDY AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS R/O PLOT NO
933 VIVEKANANDA NAGAR COLONY KUKATPALLY HYDERABAD.
(P-2 M.V. KRISHNA REDDY DIED PER LR. P-3 )
3. SMT. MALE PRABHAVATHI,, W/O. LATE M. VENKATA KRISHNA
REDDY, AGED 70 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO.3-5-43/8, PLOT NO.933, VIVEKANANDA NAGAR COLONY, KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. A THAMEEM ANSARIYA IAS, Collector and District Magistrate, Prakasam Dsitrict, at Ongole
...CONTEMNOR
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may
RC,J
be pleased to pleased to summon the respondent herein and punish him under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willfully, disobeyed and flouted the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No.21274/2018 dated 30-11-2022 (amended order dated 22-02-2023 in IA.No.1 of 2023), and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to condone the delay of 369 days in Re-presenting the
CC.SR.No.6895 of 2024 and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. V R MACHAVARAM
Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. K M KRISHNA REDDY
The Court made the following:
RC,J
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Sri V.R.Machavaram, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the order, disobedience of which is complained of in this Contempt Case, has duly been complied with this Contempt Case can be closed.
2. In view of the above submission, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________________ JUSETICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 31st March, 2026.
RR