WP/3672/2020 of M.H.C.Mahaboob, Vs Union of India, on 30 March 2026

1. M.H.C.MAHABOOB YEARS, WORKIN CENTRAL RAILW ANANTHAPUR DIS

1. UNION OF INDIA, CENTRAL RAILWA

2. THE CHIEF PERS RAIL NILAYAM, SE

3. THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY, GUNTA

4. THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY, GUNT DISTRICT. Petition under Articl circumstances stated in pleased to issue an appr in the nature of Writ of C E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) , THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARC O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT RI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVEND BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR G RIT PETITION NO: 3672/2020 B,, S/O. M.H.MOHAMMED, AGED G AS KHALASI, SSE/WORKS/N/ WAY, GUNTAKAL DIVISION, STRICT. AND , REP. BY THE GENERAL MANA AY, RAIL NILAYAM, SECUNDERABAD SONNEL OFFICER, SOUTH CENTR ECUNDERABAD. L RAILWAY MANAGER, SOUT AKAL DIVISION, GUNTAKAL. PERSONNEL OFFICER, SOUT TAKAL DIVISION, GUNTAKAL, A ...RES le 226 of the Constitution of India pra the affidavit filed therewith, the High ropriate Writ, Order or Direction more Certiorari, by calling for the records p DESH

CH DRANATH ROY GEDELA D ABOUT 59 /GTL, SOUTH GUNTAKAL, ...PETITIONER AGER, SOUTH D - 500 071. RAL RAILWAY, TH CENTRAL TH CENTRAL ANANTHAPUR SPONDENT(S): aying that in the h Court may be particularly one pertaining to the

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.3672 of 2020

orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal in OA.No. 20/526/2017 dated. 04.01.2019 which was filed for declaring the action against the counting of past service for pensionary benefits without considering, the case of the petitioner, declaring the same as arbitrary, illegal, unwarranted, and misconceived and in violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India, to direct the respondents to consider the case for counting of past service for pensionary benefits, declaring the same as arbitrary, illegal, unwarranted, and misconceived and in violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India, with all the consequential benefits and be pleased to pass such other and luilther order or orders as the Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

suspend orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal in OA.No.20/526/2017 dated 04.01.2019 which was filed fctr declaring the inaction on the part of the Respondent for counting the past service for pensionary benefits, pending disposal of the above writ petition grant leave to the respondents to file its counter affidavit and pass grant leave to writ petitioner in the Writ Petition No. 3672 of 2020 to file rejoinder to counter affidavit in the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. RAVI KIRAN PONNURU Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. JUPUDI V K YAGNADUTT(CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL)

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.3672 of 2020

The Court made the following: ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)

When the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner is also not present before the Court.

2. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

_____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

Date: 31.03.2026 MDP