Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/13523/2019 of Munichetty, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 30 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 13523/2019 Between: 1. MUNICHETTY,, S/O. MUNUSWAMY, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/O. H.

APHC010295112019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 13523/2019

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. MUNICHETTY,, S/O. MUNUSWAMY, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/O. H. NO. 1-107, SANGANAPALLI VILLAGE, GUDUPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

2. M ANANDAPPA,, S/O. LATE GOPALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O. 1-102, SANGANAPALLI VILLAGE, GUDUPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

3. G HARISH,, S/O. LATE M GOPALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O. 1-114, SANGANAPALLI VILLAGE, GUDUPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

4. SMT. JAYALAKSHMI VENKATESHAN,, W/O. VENKATESHAN, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 18, GANDHI ROAD, KRISHNAGIRI, TAMILNADU.

5. M VENKATACHALAPATHI,, S/O. MUNICHETTY, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, RIO. 1-107, SANGANAPALLI VILLAGE, GUDUPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOR, CHITTOR DISTRICT.

3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER/SUBCOLLECTOR, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOR DISTRICT.

4. THE TAHSILDAR, GUDUPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

5. THE SUBREGISTRAR, KUPPAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

6. R ARUNA KUMARI, W/O. M S NAGESH, SANGANAPALLI VILLAGE AND POST, GUDUPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. PRAKASH C Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. .

2. K V L NARASIMHA RAO

The Court made the following ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition.

2. Permission is accorded.

3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

Dated: 31.03.2026

KNN

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 13523/2019

Dated: 31.03.2026 KNN

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead