Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/9267/2019 of Batchu Lakshmana Rao Vs THE STATE OF AP on 30 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 9267/2019 Between: 1. BATCHU LAKSHMANA RAO, , S/O.LATE APPARAO, AGED ABOUT 63

APHC010212222019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 9267/2019

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. BATCHU LAKSHMANA RAO, , S/O.LATE APPARAO, AGED ABOUT

YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O.RAYAPALLI VILLAGE, ADDATEEGALA MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT AT AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION, GOVERNMENT OF A.P., GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA.

3. THE DIRECTOR OF SETTLEMENTS, GOVERNMENT OF A.P., CURRENCY NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA.

4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT KAKINADA.

5. THE TAHSILDAR, , ADDATEEGALA MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one

JS,J W.P.No.9267/2019

in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 5th respondent in not considering the representation of the petitioner dt.10-5-2016 and the legal notice dt.6-2-2019 to incorporate the name of the petitioner in the revenue records as pattadar in respect of the land of extent of 5.23 hectors in Sy.No.81 situated in Rayapalli Village, Addateegala Mandal, East Godavari District as wholly illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the 5th respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dt.10-5-2016 and the legal notice dt.6-2-2019 in accordance with law in the in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 5th respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dt.10-5-2016 and the legal notice dt.6-2-2019 to incorporate the name of the petitioner in the revenue records as pattadar in respect of the land of extent of 5.23 hectors in Sy.No.81 situated in Rayapalli Village, Addateegala Mandal, East Godavari District in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. K VENKATESH Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

JS,J W.P.No.9267/2019

The Court made the following ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents.

2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the petitioner has not made any application to incorporate the name of the petitioner in the revenue records in respect of the subject property in Sy.No.81 to an extent of Ac.5.23 hectors, situated in Rayapalli Village, Addateegala Mandal, East Godavari District.

3. In view of the submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the matter by leaving it open to the petitioner to make application to incorporate the name of the petitioner in revenue records within two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order along with relevant documents. If such application is made, respondents shall consider and pass orders on the application made by the petitioner, after giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within one (1) month thereafter.

4. With these observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________

JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 31.03.2026

RSD

JS,J

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 9267/2019

Dated: 31.03.2026

JS,J W.P.No.9267/2019

RSD

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead